The published document also shows that Nawrocki used the benefits of the Family 800 plus program last year. The declaration is dated March 31 this year and was submitted to the Supreme Court on the same day. The material includes the president's assets for 2025.
The first property is a cooperative property with an area of 57 square meters, to which the president has full rights.. The second apartment has an area of 58 square meters, and Nawrocki owns half of the shares in this property. Both properties have already appeared in the president's previous asset declarations.
Read also: Will there be money for services under SAFE? The Minister of Defense presented the project
Components of the president's estate
In the section regarding financial resources, the president showed the amount of PLN 339,000. zloty. At the same time, the head of state repays the housing loan – PLN 197,783.23 remains to be repaid. As part of the Family 800+ program, Nawrocki received PLN 19.2 thousand last year. zloty.
Document does not contain information about the possession of financial instruments. The president also did not declare collecting funds in foreign currencies. Meaning that his financial assets are limited to savings in Polish currency.
Comparison with the previous declaration
Nawrocki made his previous declaration on August 6 last year, the day he took office. It was brought to the Supreme Court on September 4. Demonstrated then the total savings amounted to PLN 130,000. PLN, i.e. it was almost three times lower than today. The document does not explain the source of this increase.
That document also contained information about two residential premises – including one in joint ownership – and a mortgage loan, the balance of which was PLN 199,981. Also then, the president took into account the income from the 800 plus benefit. Therefore, the composition of the assets remained similar to that presented in the latest declaration.
Read more about it: President Karol Nawrocki revealed his assets. The famous studio apartment has disappeared
Background: campaign controversy
During the presidential campaign, in May 2025, the staff published Nawrocki's statement from 2021.when he headed the Institute of National Remembrance (IPN). The document was made available by staff spokeswoman Emilia Wierzbicka. He listed two premises in Gdańsk, 57 square meters each – the first one belonging to the politician and his wife, the second one in joint ownership with his sister – as well as a studio apartment with an area of approximately 30 square meters. The apartment then indicated as joint ownership with the sister is the same premises where the current declaration indicates 50%. Nawrocki's shares.
“Karol Nawrocki owns two apartments with his wife. This information has always been included in his asset declarations,” Wierzbicka wrote then on the X platform, revealing the document of the then candidate. The spokeswoman also explained that “on the advice of lawyers, in order to maintain full transparency and caution, in his property declarations (Nawrocki – PAP) he also included information about the 50% share in the real estate owned by his living mother, stipulated in his will.” It was about a premises in Gdańsk with an area of 57 square meters, indicated in the declaration, where the legal title states 50%. joint ownership with her sister.
Dispute over the transparency of declarations
The publication of the declaration of Nawrocki, who ran for office with the support of Law and Justice (PiS), was previously demanded by, among others, representatives of the Civic Coalition (KO). The matter gained momentum after the debate in “Super Express”, in which the candidate assured that he only had one apartment. Later, Onet described how the politician took over the studio apartment from Jerzy Ż. in exchange for taking care of the man.
During the campaign, Nawrocki said that the studio apartment in Gdańsk was donated to charity. In accordance with applicable law, the president submits a declaration of assets to the first president of the Supreme Court. The data is confidential – the exception is when the author of the document agrees to disclose it. In such a case, the Supreme Court publishes the material on its website.
