“Burleanu clan is ko! It will be chaos! It's over Kafka” “The first reaction from FRF

The Romanian Football Federation has been accused of false, use of false and operation outside the law for the last 23 years. The FRF tried to obtain the opinion of the Court of Appeal for the latest constituent documents, but CAB ordered the court re -examination.

The case in short:

• The High Court of Cassation and Justice (JCCJ) has ruled by Decision 19/2023 that “the affiliation of new members of a sports foundation represents a modification of constitutive or status act. The rights resulting from the membership are conditioned by the registration in the Federation Register of the status change consisting of the affiliation of new members”.
• FRF has not been made since 2002 no registration steps in the TMB federations register in terms of movements through affiliates/disifilitors! The FRF asked the Court, last spring, the affiliation and disaffiliation of new members in order to update the clubs in the competitions.
• He organized an extraordinary – ghost general general assembly in April 2024, attended by only 13 of the 80 members registered in the Special Register from the Court until 2002, the last federal intervention in this document. Many of those clubs no longer exist now!
• And there was voted including the disifilitation of the University of Craiova, even at position 1, although, theoretically, Mititelu's club should have been taken out of the game since 2011, after the scandal of exclusion from Mircea Sandu!
• The court rejected the registration approach of all 278 members, we, and the Court of Appeal, in April 2025, returned to the court, where they were accepted from the beginning as the interveners of Bucharest (represented by Tudor Iacov), AFC Rapid (Horia Manoliu) and FCU Craiova (Adrian Mititelu).
• He has now published motivation

How did the Court of Appeal motivated

The appeal reasons regarding the convening and organizing the general meeting of the FRF dated 04.06.2024 exceed the object of the court in order, the request for a court call regarding the changes to the statute made by the decision of the extraordinary general meeting of 05.04.2024.

The subsequent signing of this list by the new members, resulting from the affiliates and the deficiencies, does not cover the possible non -compliance with the legal provisions regarding the measures adopted on 05.04.2024.

In re -examination, the substantive court will analyze the aspects indicated in this decision regarding: the convocation procedure, the current headquarters and the current legal situation of the FRF members registered in the Federation Register, compliance with the affiliation conditions of the new members, the submission of the documents regarding the affiliation of new members and the proof of the affiliation agreement, as well as interventions, except for those cut by this decision.

From the statutory point of view, abstracting the nullity of law and the absolute nullity of the FRF status adopted in 2014, the convening of the extraordinary general meeting was done in violation of the following provisions:

Art. 33 para. 1, by which the exclusive competence of the Ordinary General Assembly is established on:
k) examining and approving the proposals to modify the FRF status;
l) affiliation, suspension, disaffiliation, exclusion and/or withdrawal of FRF members, as the case may be.

Given that the FRF Executive Committee is made up exclusively of persons outside the FRF (they do not have a member of the FRF), it cannot be confused with the FRF Board, due to the composition established by law.

In other words, the FRF petitioner works without the establishment of the administration body established by the law, transferring/delegating its duties to an executive committee, in violation of the public order rules.

The General Assembly of the FRF does not have the power to derogate from the law by statutory provisions contrary to public order.

The exclusive competence of the Board of Directors to conclude legal acts on behalf and on behalf of FRF is seriously violated by the statutory provisions, because the legislator did not provide for the possibility of derogating by statute.

The full motivation of the Court of Appeal

Motivation of the Court of Appeal In case of process against FRF by Gazeta Sports on Scribd

Adrian Mititelu: “It's chaos! Let's see now, for example, how will he affiliate CSU Craiova? We will have a lot of fun.”

Contacted by the Sports Gazette, Adrian Mititelu commented on the motivation of over 50 pages of the Court of Appeal.

“Is it a motivation by which the Court of Appeal dusts the FRF. It does not take their action into account, because they do not meet the legal conditions. There is no request for affiliation for the clubs after 2011 and considering that they have to restore the procedure from scratch. Do you realize in which caraghious it puts them all now?

He will ask everyone to make affiliation requests now, in 2025! Domne, that's over Kafka! Burleanu was practically chosen by some entities that he will only now be forced to affiliate as he writes in the book!

Let's see now, for example, how will he affiliate CSU Craiova? How? Because, according to their own regulations, a club must go through the sports criteria, that is to come through promotion/relegation from the fourth league. It would mean that FRF now to violate the laws after which the institution operates. I tell you: it's something that hurts your head!

Please read the motivation and you will see clearly that FCU Craiova is recognized as one of the few clubs legally affiliated with the FRF. We are dealing, in fact, with a general imposture, about a gentleman who prevails by a mandate obtained in false, with the help of non-affiliated voters! Do you really take us fools?

And something else! You know that there is a Department or Nene in the FRF that issues documents in the licensing procedures, that club X or Y is affiliated with the federation, as part of the necessary documentation in the field. A bigger fake does not exist! How do they licensed in this way? Confirm that some are affiliated with which the court now emphasizes that they are not affiliated! I give some papers that have the same legal value as some written on the knees, at the corner of the street!

And let's see how AJFs will affiliate! That there is fun in the world. Many of those, in their turn, have natural persons, recorded records for years, with presidents remaining in documents, those about 20 years ago, who have also gone out, in the meantime! A total legal disaster! And does Burleanu come to talk to us about the regulations?!

That's right, the Court of Appeal rejected the request to be called a curator, explaining that this can be done on another appeal. Which is very correct. Here I only followed an incessant procedure. That is, the judge now says that he is good, for the moment, the decisions of the general meetings of FRF in recent years, until there is a sentence that will abolish them.

But that day will come too! I promise you! However, we are ongoing with other processes exactly on this side, so that we can complete the painting. For now, we have confirmation that affiliations should be taken from scratch with all those who do not appear in the 2011 Federation Register.

And step two, logically, will be the one with the invalidation of the general meetings, made with non -affiliated members. We will have a lot of fun in the next period! Let's see where I get the shirt now and what these will explain to them to be asked to affiliate now! A chaos! ”, Said Adrian Mititelu.

How FRF reacted

Adrian Stântaciu, the FRF lawyer, offered a short reply after the statements of Adrian Mititelu.

“Mr. Mititelu insists on creating confusion between two different issues. The Mandate of the FRF president is legal and valid! The registration in the register of federations of the general meeting of the FRF represents an ongoing process, as a result of the FRF appeal,” he said.