Dinamo, the champion of fines for incidents » Rapid, FCSB and a surprise, in the top of the sanctioned clubs
Article by George Nistor – Published Sunday, October 19, 2025, 1:21 p.m. / Updated Sunday, October 19, 2025, 1:32 p.m.
Of all the clubs in the Superliga, Dinamo collected, this season, the largest fines for incidents both at home and away matches, mostly caused by supporters. He follows her, not far off, Rapidthe opponent of the “dogs” in the derby scheduled tonight, at the National Arena.
Gazeta Sporturilor compiled a ranking of the financial sanctions dictated by the Disciplinary Commission of the LPF against clubs in the first echelon, in the first 12 rounds of the competition.
Only 9 entities out of the 16 were penalized, totaling 202,000 lei. The top includes, surprisingly, the names of some formations with less radical galleries, such as Csikszereda, CFR Cluj and FC Argeș, while Petrolul bridges the gap between the giants and the less noticed undisciplined ones.
Dinamo, fined 42,500 lei in 12 stages
Even if recently Andrei Nicolescu emphasized that security at Dinamo's matches, especially at “home” matches, is a priority for the club, tense episodes were not absent in the current championship edition either.
The 4th place player has accumulated fines of 42,500 lei in just four games, three of which were played away.
The duel with Petrolul, from Ploiesti, earned him a penalty of 18,750 lei as a result of the unauthorized entry of spectators onto the playing surface, namely the throwing of objects and the use of pyrotechnic materials.
Top clubs sanctioned for incidents in the Superliga
|
Place |
Club |
Penalties (lei) |
No. matches |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1 |
Dinamo |
42,500 |
4 |
|
2 |
Rapid |
37,500 |
5 |
|
3 |
FCSB |
35,000 |
4 |
|
4 |
The oil |
32,500 |
4 |
|
5 |
U Cluj |
17,500 |
2 |
|
6 |
CFR Cluj |
15,000 |
1 |
|
7 |
Csikszereda |
10,000 |
2 |
|
8 |
FC Arges |
10,000 |
3 |
|
9 |
Ato |
2,000 |
1 |
* The GSP analysis did not include standard player penalties for sending offs or acts of indiscipline. In these cases, the players are fined, not the club.
* Not all fines are paid by the club. If there are multiple sanctions within the same sporting event, the entity executes the sanction for the most serious offense.
What was Dinamo fined for?
|
Amount (lei) |
opponent |
Cause |
|---|---|---|
|
7,500 |
The oil |
Entry of spectators onto the lawn |
|
11,250 |
The oil |
Throwing objects and using pyrotechnic materials |
|
11,250 |
U Cluj |
Throwing objects and using pyrotechnic materials |
|
5,000 |
Csikszereda |
Entry of spectators onto the lawn |
|
7,500 |
FCSB |
Throwing objects and using pyrotechnic materials |
Dinamo's gallery, at the Csikszereda stadium
Fast, in second position
After the events that led to the opening of the “Pyro File”, the people of Giulești tightened controls on access to the stadium, including the VIP area. At each game, the cars are thoroughly controlled, and the number of stewards has been increased, but without positive effects.
Of the total fines that reach 37,500 lei, more than half are for disturbing the order by throwing objects and using pyrotechnic materials.
It is interesting that the organizational problems, detected by the game observer, brought Rapid a reprimand worth 5000 lei. In question, the match against FC Botoșani, from the 4th stage, in which Baroan's “double” brought victory.
|
Amount (lei) |
opponent |
Cause |
|---|---|---|
|
10,000 |
lighthouse |
Entry of spectators onto the lawn |
|
5,000 |
Botosani |
Organizational deficiency |
|
7,500 |
The oil |
Throwing objects and using pyrotechnic materials |
|
5,000 |
Hermannstadt |
Throwing objects and using pyrotechnic materials |
|
10,000 |
FCSB |
Throwing objects and using pyrotechnic materials |
What sanctions did the FCSB receive?
|
Amount (lei) |
opponent |
Cause |
|---|---|---|
|
5,000 |
Rapid |
Incidents caused by supporters |
|
5,000 |
Rapid |
Organizational misconduct |
|
5,000 |
Botosani |
Organizational misconduct |
|
10,000 |
Dinamo |
Throwing objects and using pyrotechnic materials |
|
5,000 |
lighthouse |
Organizational misconduct |
|
5,000 |
lighthouse |
Throwing objects |
Csikszereda suffers in terms of organization
|
Amount (lei) |
opponent |
Cause |
|---|---|---|
|
5,000 |
Rapid* |
Organizational misconduct |
|
5,000 |
Dinamo |
Entry of spectators onto the lawn |
* When reporting to the Gendarmerie, for alcohol consumption at the stadium
Oil fans don't care about financial problems
|
Amount (lei) |
opponent |
Cause |
|---|---|---|
|
7,500 |
Rapid |
Throwing objects and using pyrotechnic materials |
|
5,000 |
Slobozia |
Xenophobic or racist behaviour |
|
5,000 |
Dinamo |
Entry of spectators onto the lawn |
|
10,000 |
Dinamo |
Throwing objects and using pyrotechnic materials |
|
5,000 |
FCSB |
Throwing objects |
The reasons for the penalties for the other clubs
|
Club |
opponent |
Amount (lei) |
Cause |
|---|---|---|---|
|
FC Arges |
Hermannstadt |
2,000 |
Organizational misconduct |
|
FC Botosani |
5,000 |
Entry of spectators onto the lawn |
|
|
Ato |
3,000 |
Organizational misconduct |
|
|
U Cluj |
CFR Cluj |
7,500 |
Throwing objects and using pyrotechnic materials |
|
CFR Cluj |
5,000 |
Entry of spectators onto the lawn |
|
|
Dinamo |
5,000 |
Throwing objects and using pyrotechnic materials |
|
|
CFR Cluj |
U Cluj |
10,000 |
Throwing objects and using pyrotechnic materials |
|
U Cluj |
5,000 |
Entry of spectators onto the lawn |
|
|
Ato |
FC Arges |
2,000 |
Throwing objects |
