Macron is pronounced against the reversal of the Iran regime and warns on the “chaos” that will follow in this scenario

The statement of the French president comes in the context of information that the US could directly involve in the war between Israel and Iran, I write Reuters and Polito.

Emmanuel Macron warned Tuesday that the violence of the Tehran regime could have destabilizing effects in the Middle East.

“The biggest mistake now would be to try to force a change of regime in Iran by military means, because that would lead to chaos,” said French president on the last day of the G7 summit in Canada.

“No one knows what will come afterwards,” Macron said, stressing that France “does not support regional destabilization actions.”

In his warning, Macron reminded US and NATO allies in Iraq and Libya, saying that these are not repeated, considering that they have generated huge political instability.

“Didn't I all see the consequences that these things had in the region and beyond? Does anyone still think what was done in Iraq in 2003 was a good idea? Does anyone still think what was done in Libya was a good idea? No,” said the French president, noting that countries in the region do not need “chaos”.

The Israeli objective

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu suggested that blows against Iran could open the way of a regime.

The goal of Israel was to eliminate nuclear threat and ballistic missiles, he said, but added: “As we reach our goal, we open the way to freedom.”

“The regime does not know what to hit, or what will hit it. It has never been weaker. This is your opportunity to get up and make your voices heard,” Netanyahu said.

The Israeli prime minister appealed to a change in the Iranian government in September.

The scenario taken into account by the US

Macron's comments came against the background of fears that the US could directly involve in the conflict between Israel and Iran, possibly by a blow against the Forto nuclear installation.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz also said Tuesday that Trump is really considering the option of involving the US.

This scenario was to be discussed at a meeting of the US President with his advisers on Tuesday.

Trump himself reported his intentions, in a series of posts on Social Truth before the meeting in the White House crisis.

“Now we have complete and total control over Iran's airspace. Iran had air tracking systems and other good defensive equipment, and in large quantities, but it is not compared to those made in the US,” Trump wrote.

A few minutes later, he warned the supreme leader of Iran, Ali Khamena, not to attack the American forces in the Middle East. “We know exactly where the so-called” supreme leader “is hidden. It is an easy target, but there is safe. We will not eliminate it (kill!), At least not for the moment. But we do not want to release missiles on civilians or American soldiers. Our patience is exhausted,” Trump wrote.

In a third post, which came in less than an hour, Trump wrote: “unconditional capitulation”.

“An incident”

Macron also made a reference to Trump's statement, which had criticized him earlier, when leaving the G7 summit.

Trump attacked Macron after he had suggested that the White House leader was leaving the summit earlier to complete an armistice proposal between Israel and Iran.

Trump said Macron “is always wrong” and does not negotiate a cessation of fire.

Macron later said he was not upset by Trump's attack, calling his comment “an incident.”

“It does not affect me,” Macron said, stressing that Trump “had a few very friendly words” for him during the rest of the summit and that their relationships are good.

The French president claimed, however, that Trump told him he was working on a possible cessation of fire and suggested that he could have changed his mind.

“There was undoubtedly a change of opinion. But I am not responsible for changing the American administration,” Macron said.