The Chisinau government rejects Simion's accusations: Romanians from the Republic of Moldova voted freely
Voters next to a Chisinau voting section. Photo: Oxana Bodnar / Hotnews
The Chisinau government rejected on Tuesday evening the statements of the gold leader, George Simion, which claimed that the Republic of Moldova was involved in frauding the Romanian Presidential Ilections, emphasizing that the vote of Romanians in Moldova was a free and democratic one. “The large number of people who came to the vote for the presidential elections in Romania shows how much they care about the future of Romania,” the government of the neighboring country said, in an official statement, according to the press over Prut.
“The election campaigns can be accompanied by tensions and emotions, but, out of respect for all Romanian citizens, we call on political actors to avoid unfounded accusations and offenses against voters in the Republic of Moldova,” said the spokesman of the Moldovan executive, Daniel Voda, who also asked for the political class.
“Romanians from the Republic of Moldova voted freely,” said Daniel Voda.
What George Simion argued when announced on Tuesday that he will challenge the presidential election result at the Constitutional Court:
- “It was about buying votes! 100 million euros was the budget allocated in the Republic of Moldova, only, for electoral tourism and for the purchase of the will of the Bessarabian Romanians who have been unfairly deaconed in the last week. Because they used administrative resources of another state to cancel the elections. Because deceased people voted at the May 18 election and no calculations in the world can show us that over 11,500,000 Romanians were voting. The international observers saw interference, not only from the Republic of Moldova, but also from the French state. The social networks were handled and the algorithms were used in the direction of influencing Romanian citizens. The testimony of the Creator Telegram in which he says that the French government intervened to censure our voices during this period is grateful and demand the hearing of the Creator Telegram before these elections are declared valid.
- State actors, such as the Republic of Moldova and France, and non -state actors who have influenced the algorithms of social networks are proved and must be the High Court and the Constitutional Court to take these evidence.“
