Nawrocki convened a conference. So explains the matter of the apartment


Let us remind you that Onet revealed last week that the presidential candidate supported by PiS, Contrary to the declaration of the presidential debate in “Super Expresie”, he is not the owner of one, but two apartments. In addition to living in Gdańsk, where he lives with his family, she also has a studio apartment.
On Monday, the website said that in 2017 Jerzy Ż. – then the owner of a studio – he gave it to Nawrocki and his wife in exchange for care and maintenance, i.e. on the basis of a life contract, However, the man went to a social welfare home. On Tuesday, Nawrocki's property declaration made in 2021 was published on the Internet, made by him as the president of the Institute of National Remembrance, in which he mentioned two ownership apartments, which he has with his wife and the third – 50 percent. joint ownership with my sister.
On Tuesday, Onet published a conversation with the social welfare worker Anna Kanigowska, who looked after Jerzy Ż. From spring 2022 to spring 2023, in her opinion, “Mr. Jerzy lived in poverty”, “he had practically nothing”, “without allocation with mopr” and without purchases “he would have no food”. The babysitter said that she tried to find out from Nawrocki why she did not help the pensioner, since he took over his apartment in exchange for care and that she sent a letter to Nawrocki in this matter.
See also: The guardian of Mr. Jerzy: Nawrocki did nothing for Mr. Jerzy except taking over his apartment. And he is insolently lying that he was paying bills
According to Nawrocki, He acquired a studio “by him” was fully in accordance with the law. “ On Tuesday, in the online program of Bogdan Rymanowski, Nawrocki said that the issue of help he gave Jerzy Ż. And the purchase of an apartment is separate matters. He stated that in the matter of living inhabited by Jerzy Ż. There is nothing to complain about.
Nawrocki stated that in the debate of “Super Express”, that he was the owner of one, not three apartments, he did not pass with the truth. As he said, when it comes to a studio apartment in which Jerzy Ż. Although, according to the law, he is its owner, he does not treat this apartment as his property, but as the property of Jerzy Ż. Because he noted, it was by Jerzy. It was inhabited. He added, he committed Jerzy Ż to help. Nawrocki also noted that he entered the third apartment in the statement of foresight, and his co -owner and his sister would become after his mother's death.




