Investigation a site “Tour 2 Back” and the tiktok of a retirement judge urged the assault of the courts of appeal with the CCR decision cancellation requests
Captures on the website “Tour 2 Back” and the Tiktok account of the former judge Lăcrămioara Axinte
Over 130 applications regarding the annulment or suspension of the decision of the Constitutional Court of Romania (CCR) to annul the presidential elections of December 2024 were registered with the Courts of Appeal in Romania on April 8-17. On a site bearing the name “Tour 2 back”, the users are trained, step by step, how to sue the CCR. The page has a reference to the Tiktok account of a former judge of the Botosani Tribunal. There, Judge Lăcrămioara Axinte, currently retired, explains how the stamp duty is paid.
The first request regarding the annulment of the CCR decision of December 2024 was registered on April 8, 2025 at the Timișoara Court of Appeal.
On that day, the former Judge Lăcrămioara Axinte, publishes Tiktok a video in which he taught the followers how a judicial fee can be paid on the Ghiseul.ro platform, offering the indications on a phone. The video on the judge's tiktok was posted the same day on the website https://anulacr.vercel.app.
There were also posted the instructions for the court to sue the Constitutional Court. Users receive all the indications, starting from the foruming of the action to the contact details of the courts of appeal. In addition, the deadline to send the requests, as well as the documents to attach to the request, including the evidence of payment of stamp duties, were also warned.
Two days away after publishing the instructions on the site, the registrations of the courts of appeal in the country were assaulted with emails by which the Coastal Court was sued as a defendant.
90 actions in one day
Over 90 actions requesting the annulment of the CCR decision were registered on April 10. They all had the same print and the documents indicated on the respective site.
According to hotnews centralized data, at least six families have submitted applications simultaneously. Most requests were registered at the Bucharest Court of Appeal (CAB): not less than 30. All have already been resolved by the court: the judges rejected the applications, invoking the lack of jurisdiction of the courts to judge a CCR decision. All 30 CAB decisions have already been challenged by petitioners.
Another 12 applications were rejected by the courts of appeal in the country, the other files being in the role of the courts. The exception to “reject the line” registered today at the Ploiești Court of Appeal, where Judge Alexandru Vasile admitted such a request and decided to suspend the effects of the Constitutional Court's decision, until the final settlement of the file.
Another full of the same court rejected, a day ago, a similar request, made by another person.
The situation of requests on courts of appeal is presented as follows:
- The Bucharest Court of Appeal – 30 applications
- Iași Court of Appeal – 15 applications
- Suceava Court of Appeal – 15 applications
- Cluj Court of Appeal – 16 applications
- Alba Iulia Court of Appeal – 11 applications
- Ploiești Court of Appeal: – 11 requests
- Bacău Court of Appeal – 8 applications
- Târgu Mureș Court of Appeal – 7 applications
- Pitesti Court of Appeal: – 7 applications
- Craiova Court of Appeal – 7 applications
- Galati Court of Appeal: – 5 requests
- Constanta Court of Appeal: – 5 requests
- Timișoara Court of Appeal – 4 applications
- Oradea Court of Appeal: – 2 requests
The information about the multitude of requests was first reported on Facebook, by a teacher from UBB Cluj-Napoca, and in the newsletter of former journalist Bianca Oanea.
The decision of the Ploiești Court of Appeal
Judge Alexandru Vasile from the Ploieşti Court of Appeal decided on Thursday to annul and suspend the decision of the Constitutional Court (CCR) to annul the presidential elections of December 2024. The decision can be challenged within five days from the ruling, writes on the court portal, and the appeal will be judged by the High Court, which has been judged by the High Court. Resuming the Tour of Presidential Election.
The Prosecutor's Office attached to the Ploiești Court of Appeal has appealed against the decision given during Thursday by the Ploiești Court of Appeal-the administrative and fiscal litigation section, the Public Ministry announced, in a press release.
The Superior Council of Magistracy announced that it has notified the Judicial Inspection in the case of Judge Alexandru Vasile.
Cristi Dănileț, the former judge and former member of the SCM, argues, in a Facebook post, that, in the case of the Ploiești Court of Appeal, “the file was directed to a certain judge”.
“In order to circumvent the computerized random distribution system, several persons-who are not related to the right-have filed the same request to the same court (Ploiești Court of Appeal), on the same day. The files were registered one after another, from no 292 to 304. In this way, it is enough for one to arrive”.
