The whole scandal related to the rights of the magistrates seems to me a huge noise created around false problems. Which ignores / hides real problems. That exists. And that no one wants to solve.
Photo archive
The discussions revolve almost exclusively in the area of wages and pensions. From some punctual problems that exist (for example, it is not normal for the pension to be higher than the salary) and which I do not think the magistrates deny them, it is reached, in the absence of any reasoning, to the conclusion that all the magistrates are incompetent, corrupt, lazy, stubborn, etc. We have a professional category that, in the block, is the subject of a hate speech. Speech devoid of any shades.
The discourse of politicians related to cutting the rights of magistrates is terribly resembles the discourse of the same politicians about the measures related to the increase of punishments for certain categories of crimes.
Photo Truth
A rape shakes the public. The death of a drug consumer at an important festival, as well. Politics must react immediately. What is he doing? Increases the punishments in criminal law. That is, nothing effective, nothing to solve the real problems. Because the increase of punishments does not discourage the crime and does not lead to the catch and conviction of the criminals. Increasing punishments (often incoherent and unrelated to the rest of the legal provisions) does well for the image. Feed the thirst for blood. But it does not solve anything. The image is pursued. So much. Not solving problems. Not creating effective mechanisms.
It is easy to increase pen penalties, as it is easy to cut in pen rights. But nothing will be resolved for the smooth running of things. Because this is not desired either. In order to combat sexual violence or drug trafficking/use, it is not necessary to increase the punishments endlessly. It is necessary to create efficient structures and form specialists. To organize. Also, if you want an effective judicial system, you must organize, simply cut rights. No one speaks about the need for organization of the system. It's boring complicated for some people in a hurry to accumulate image capital.
The vertical Mr. Bolojan successfully represents the party which, in recent years, has put justice on the logs. With the support of magistrates who continue to hold key functions. Which does not seem to disturb the political heroes of the moment too hard. Who are willing to go on stage and cut into live meat. To the public's delight. “The traditional question in the political theory:” Who should govern? “, Question that claims an authoritarian answer of the” best “or” wisest “, or” people “, or” most “… must be replaced with the question:” How can we organize our political institutions so that the bad or incompetent leaders cannot be able to do much? ” (Karl Popper – about the sources of knowledge and ignorance).
Photo Inquam / Octav Ganea
How can we organize the judicial system so that it is more efficient? So that the risks of incompetence or corruption are much limited. In such a way that if you magistrate with integrity problems or who do political games, they will not be able to do too much. (I believe that only in this framework should be discussed the issue of rights.)
Some possible questions that do not bother our politicians. No one wants an independent and strong justice.
For now, only a scapegoat is needed. Politician deficiencies are thrown into the magistrates. Especially those who work seriously and wake up in the pot of corrupt, profiteers and nonsense.
The comic is that I voted against the speech of hatred, against the extremist speech of Georgești and Simions, and now I am part of a professional category to be beaten in the democratic street. I would continue to vote against them without hesitating, but I cannot help but taste the irony of the situation.
