Featured

Israel's operation in Iran continues. Three issues to solve


Netanyahu gave his first interview to a US television station since the outbreak of the conflict with Iran, an armed clash that began after tensions escalated over Iran's nuclear program and Tehran's pursuit of uranium enrichment. The conversation was broadcast on CBS News' “60 Minutes” on Saturday. The head of the Israeli government emphasized that although the military actions brought results, three issues remain unresolved: the removal of enriched uranium from Iran, the dismantling of enrichment facilities, and the neutralization of Iran's militant networks and missile program.
The article continues below the video

Netanyahu on the purpose of the operation

Asked about how the highly enriched uranium would be disposed of, Netanyahu responded succinctly. “You go in and take it away,” he said. He also said that President Donald Trump told him: “I want to go in there,” and that physically performing such an operation would not be a problem – provided there is an agreement. However, the politician refused to reveal the schedule or details of possible actions in the event of no agreement.

Netanyahu clearly ruled out the possibility of linking the ceasefire with Iran with the end of military operations against Lebanese Hezbollah. As he stated, Tehran wants such a solution because it would allow Hezbollah to continue shelling Israeli cities and harassing Lebanon. Asked if he would reject such a call even at Trump's request, he replied: “He understands what I'm saying.”

The head of the Israeli government expressed his belief that the fall of the Iranian regime would mean the end of Hezbollah, Hamas, and probably the Houthis as well. He also noted that the overthrow of the government in Tehran is possible, but uncertain.

Trump ready for surgery despite the risks

Netanyahu commented on reports from the New York Times that he allegedly tried to convince Trump during a meeting at the White House on February 11 that a joint US-Israeli operation would lead to regime change in Iran. He denied making any guarantees of success and emphasized that both he and Trump were fully aware of the risks.

But he acknowledged that he and Trump had concluded that the danger of taking action was less than the danger of inaction. He also touched on the issue of the Strait of Hormuz, stating that the threat of its blocking “became clear during the course of action,” suggesting that he had not anticipated this eventuality. Closing the strait, as he pointed out, also posed a danger to Iran itself.

Ashley Davis

I’m Ashley Davis as an editor, I’m committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity and accuracy in every piece we publish. My work is driven by curiosity, a passion for truth, and a belief that journalism plays a crucial role in shaping public discourse. I strive to tell stories that not only inform but also inspire action and conversation.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button