On Tuesday, the Polish national football team will play an “all-out” match against Sweden in Stockholm. At stake is participation in the World Cup, which will be held in June in the USA, Mexico and Canada. After the victory over Albania in Warsaw, the Poles still have one more obstacle left to be among the 48 best teams in the world. However, the task will not be easy – and this is quite a unanimous opinion of the market.
The text continues below the video
The clash between Poles and Swedes is an interesting example of how the financial market evaluates probability. Sweden, as the host, plays at home and this influences the assessment of the chances from the very beginning. Poland comes as an underdog (i.e. Cinderella) and both bookmaker odds and specialist websites confirm this.
Rates like financial markets. This is what it says about Poland's chances
Because in this world, the rate is not just a forecast – it is a price. And the price is created exactly as in financial markets: through the interaction of supply and demand of capital. The more money goes to a given outcome, the lower its price, and therefore the market considers it more likely. That's why we talk about the “follow the money” principle – follow the money, because in practice it determines the “official” assessment of the chances.
The match takes place in Stockholm, which means Sweden has an advantage – its own stadium, its own audience and no travel (although this aspect is less and less important in modern football). Poland has to play in a more difficult environment, with the stadium full of Swedish fans, which is important in qualifying at this level. Additionally, it is a high-stakes fight – advancement to the World Cup – where one mistake can decide everything.
But something else is crucial: this is one match, not a series of matches. This means more randomness, more variance and greater importance of individual events. Therefore, the odds on the result after 90 minutes are interpreted differently from those on advancement, with potential extra time and penalty shootouts.
- Read also: Donald Trump's decision is ruining businesses in the US. Huge losses
Money talks. Here's who's the favorite in the play-offs
Looking at the odds from different betting markets – both domestic and foreign – you can see a very consistent picture. SSweden is the clear favorite and Poland is the underdog. Odds for the host team are around 2.00–2.10, for a draw around 3.30–3.50, and for Poland around 3.75–4.00. What does this mean? If we bet one zloty on Sweden, we win PLN 2-2.10, on a draw we win PLN 3.30 – PLN 3.50, and if we want to bet that Poland will win, we win PLN 3.75-4. Of course, for larger amounts, we multiply our amount. It is also worth noting that bookmakers impose their own margin, so the possible winnings will be smaller.
Translating the previously given odds into probabilities, before taking into account the margin, the market suggests more or less the following chances: Sweden around 47-50%, a draw around 28-30% and Poland around 24-26%. Importantly, a similar picture can be seen both on the Polish and foreign markets, which means that it is not the result of local emotions, but a broad consensus of capital.
This can be compared to the financial market: the rate behaves like the price of an asset, which changes depending on how much capital “flows” into it. If more investors believe that Sweden will win, its “price” increases (the exchange rate falls), and Poland becomes more expensive because the market assigns it a lower probability.
90 minutes and promotion – two different markets
A significant difference appears when we compare the 90-minute result market with the promotion market. On platforms such as Polymarket, which acts as a prediction market, we see more “pure” probabilities only for regular game time: Sweden around 48%, draw around 29%. and Poland about 25 percent. On Polymarket, users trade contracts on the outcome of an event, so there is no bookmaker margin.
However, the promotion market, which includes overtime and penalties, shows clearly greater chances for Sweden. Odds of 1.51–1.53 translate into approximately 65–66 percent. probability of the hosts advancing, while Poland has approximately 38-42% at odds of 2.40–2.65. chances.
This is logical, because the longer the script, the less randomness. The match must end with one of the sides advancing – in the event of a score before the 90th minute, three results are possible, but a draw means extra time and then penalties – a winner must be chosen. Therefore, the “promotion” odds have only two options and are even more tilted in Sweden's favor, because overtime means an additional 30 minutes of play, where the hosts (i.e., according to the numbers, the favorites) will have the opportunity to tip the scales in their favor. Greater randomness appears only in penalty shootouts – if they happened, in live betting you can expect fairly equal odds and chances close to 50/50.
Margin – why the sum doesn't add up to 100%.
Bookmakers' odds are never “pure”. They include a margin, i.e. the operator's commission, which is why the converted probabilities always add up to over 100%. In practice, it looks like this: if the rates point to Sweden at around 50%, the draw is around 29%. and Poland about 25 percent, so together it gives approximately 104 percent.
After deducting the margin, we get a more realistic picture of the market – Sweden about 47%, draw about 27%, Poland about 26%. It is these values that best reflect the “pure” probability assessment that the market assigns to this match.
- Read also: “Betrayal of tradition”. Fans complain about World Cup ticket prices
“Follow the money” in practice
The easiest way to see how the market works is to look at the potential payouts. If someone bets PLN 100 on Sweden with odds of 2.00, they will win another PLN 100 if they are successful. However, if he bets PLN 100 on Poland at an exchange rate of 3.90, the potential profit may amount to PLN 290.
This is not a coincidence – the market pays more where it thinks there is less opportunity. And that's why Poland has higher rates. This is not a “penalty”, but a mathematical consequence of risk valuation.
This can be simplified to one rule: the higher the potential return, the lower the probability according to the market. And since Poland offers a higher potential return, it means the market considers it a less likely winner.
The course is market knowledge and “live” numbers
The courses can be called aggregated market knowledge. They take into account the form of teams, lineups, statistics, and mathematical models. They react to new information (injuries, lineups). They often change as new information about a given event appears. And an important thing – the bookmaker is a business, so he cares about profit. The courses are designed to help him earn as much as possible, so they are tailored to that. The opinions of experts or fans do not cost money, but the bookmaker is playing with his money when issuing multipliers – hence it can be considered the most objective indicator. “Put your money where the mouth is” – as the American saying goes, if you are sure of what you say, put your money where your mouth is.
The question often arises whether the Polish market is overestimating odds for Poland because players are more likely to bet on their own team. That's partially true, but in this case it doesn't change the overall picture.
Rates in different markets – both local and foreign – are very similar. This means that global capital, regardless of the country, values this match in a similar way. And this leads to one conclusion: fans' emotions do not dominate the market.
- Read also: They produce 160 thousand footballs per month. They earn less than the price of one
A clear picture before the match. The market assessed the chances of Poles
If you look at this match through the prism of money, the picture is quite clear. Sweden, as host, is the clear favorite both in the 90 minutes and in the advancement scenario. Poland remains the underdog, although it still has real chances – especially in a single match, where chaos and chance play a large role.
It is worth noting that in the semi-final match against Albania, the Poles were significant favorites, bigger than the current Swedes – the odds for our representatives were around 1.72.
The most important conclusion, however, is broader than this one match. Rates work like financial markets – they reflect collective knowledge, emotions and capital. And while they don't provide certainty, they are often one of the best available indicators of what might happen.
And in this case, the market says one thing: Sweden has the advantage. Now the question is whether the pitch will vindicate the valuation — or completely upend it. After all, sports can be even more unpredictable than financial markets.
Playing with a bookmaker or on prediction sites is risk and gambling. This involves the risk of losing money.
