Nicușor Dan, the politician in whom the citizens of Bucharest have the greatest confidence. The Mayoral candidate in first place

The President of Romania, Nicușor Dan, is the political personality in whom the citizens of Bucharest have the most trust, according to the sixth edition of the Informat.ro BAROMETER – INSCOP Research, conducted between November 17 and 19, 2025. According to the survey, 44.2% of the capital's residents declare that they have quite a lot or a lot of trust in the current head of state, who was previously mayor general of Bucharest.

Nicușor Dan, the political personality in whom the citizens of Bucharest have the greatest confidence. PHOTO: inscop.ro
The barometer, produced by INSCOP Research for the Informat.ro news platform, in partnership with the think-tank Strategic Thinking Group, aims to bring to the public's attention topics relevant to society and public policies, analyzing Romanians' opinions about political personalities and socio-political developments.
Notoriety: Nicușor Dan, George Simion and Călin Georgescu – the best known

PHOTO Mediafax
In terms of notoriety, almost all residents of the Capital have heard of Nicușor Dan (99.4%), George Simion (98.6%) and Călin Georgescu (98.2%). Followed by Ilie Bolojan (95.6%), Daniel Băluță (90%) and Sorin Grindeanu (87.1%). In the lower part are Anca Alexandrescu (80.5%), Cătălin Drula (78.1%), Ciprian Ciucu (74.4%) and Dominic Fritz (69.5%).
The survey shows that Nicușor Dan is followed in the trust list by:
- Ilie Bolojan – 36.6% confidence (38.3% of those who know him)
- Daniel Băluță – 33.8% (37.6% of those who have heard of him)
- Ciprian Ciucu – 32.1% (43.1% compared to those who know him)
- Călin Georgescu – 25.9% (26.4% of those familiar with him)
- Cătălin Drula – 19% (24.3% of those who know him)
- Dominic Fritz – 17.2% (24.7% of those who have heard of him)
- Anca Alexandrescu – 17.1% (21.2% among those who know her)
- Sorin Grindeanu – 14.6% (16.8% of those who know him)
Director of INSCOP Research, Remus Ștefureac, explained that confidence levels must be interpreted together with notoriety: “Lesser-known personalities naturally have a smaller basis for evaluation. Also, questions about trust do not necessarily reflect voting intention – a respondent may trust more than one personality at once.”
The study was conducted through telephone interviews (CATI) on a sample of 1,107 adults, representative of the non-institutionalized population of the Municipality of Bucharest. The maximum margin of error is ±2.95% at a 95% confidence level.




