Senate Republican leader John Thune said on Thursday that “the time has come” to proceed with the “crushing” sanctions against Russia bill and announced that he would put it to a vote, Punchbowl News reported. According to AP, the White House has signaled interest in the project in recent days.
As a reporter from Punchbowl News, a portal covering the American Congress, reported on the
– I think it's the right time (…) We have to move on with this, said Thune, who was to meet with Graham on the matter.
The Republican leader's words suggest a breakthrough in the matter of sanctions against Russia. The project was submitted by members of both parties in April and gained huge support in the chamber – over 80 out of 100 senators signed it – but since then it has not been proceeded due to the attitude of the party leadership, which was waiting for the green light from President Donald Trump.
Thune's statement was made while Trump was still on the phone with Vladimir Putin and before Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's visit to the White House on Friday.
As reported by the AP agency, over the last few days the White House has signaled renewed interest in the project by proposing specific changes. A White House official told the agency that any sanctions package must give the president “full flexibility” in applying them.
The project submitted by Graham and Blumenthal calls for imposing sanctions on a number of entities in Russia's banking and energy sectors and its “shadow fleet”, as well as a 500 percent tariffs on countries importing Russian oil and gas.
As a source associated with the Ukrainian parliamentary group in Congress told PAP, these provisions will almost certainly change in their final form if the bill is adopted. If this happened, it would be the first sanctions against Russia during Trump's second term, not counting the additional 25%. duties introduced on goods from India for the import of Russian oil.
On Wednesday, President Trump said India had agreed to stop importing Russian oil.
From Washington Oskar Górzyński (PAP)
osk/mal/
The Trump administration is considering a radical overhaul of the US refugee system that would slash the program to its bare bones while giving preference to English speakers, white South Africans and Europeans who oppose migration, according to documents obtained by The New York Times.
The proposals, some of which already have gone into effect, would transform a decades-old program aimed at helping the world's most desperate people into one that conforms to Mr. Trump's vision of immigration — which is to help mostly white people who say they are being persecuted while keeping the vast majority of other people out.
The plans were presented to the White House in April and July by officials in the State and Homeland Security Departments after President Trump directed federal agencies to study whether refugee resettlement was in the interest of the United States. Mr. Trump had suspended refugee admissions on his first day in office and solicited the proposals about how and whether the administration should continue the program.
Trump administration officials have not ruled out any of the ideas, according to people familiar with the planning, although there is no set timetable for approving or rejecting the ideas. The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the confidential plans.
The proposed changes would put new emphasis on whether applicants would be able to assimilate into the United States, directing them to take classes on “American history and values” and “respect for cultural norms.”
The proposals also advise Mr. Trump to prioritize Europeans who have been “targeted for peaceful expression of views online such as opposition to mass migration or support for 'populist' political parties.”
That appeared to be a reference to the European far-right political party Alternative for Germany, whose leaders have trivialized the Holocaust, revived Nazi slogans and denigrated foreigners. Vice President JD Vance has denied Germany for trying to suppress the views of the group, which is known as the AfD.
A senior official said the Trump administration was monitoring the situation in Europe to determine whether anyone would be eligible for refugee status. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity because the plan had not been finalized.
Mr. Trump enacted some of the proposals in the documents even before the plans were submitted to him, including slashing refugee admissions and offering priority status to Afrikaners, the white minority that once wounded South Africa's brutal apartheid system.
Mr. Trump has claimed that Afrikaners face racial persecution in their home country, a claim vigorously disputed by government officials there. Police statistics do not show that white people are more vulnerable to violent crime than other people in South Africa.
Sign up for the Race/Related Newsletter Join a deep and provocative exploration of race, identity and society with New York Times journalists. Get it sent to your inbox.Taken together, the proposals provide a window into Mr. Trump's intentions for a program that has come to symbolize America's role as a sanctuary.
Mr. Trump and many American voters have rejected that role after years of record illegal crossings at the US-Mexico border. Although the refugee program, with its meticulous screening processes and yearslong waits, is considered the “right way” of seeking protection in the United States, Mr. Trump has made clear he wants to crack down on immigration in general — both legal and illegal.
According to the rationale laid out in the documents submitted to Mr. Trump, America's acceptance of refugees has made the country too diverse.
“The sharp increase in diversity has reduced the level of social trust essential for the functioning of a democratic policy,” according to one of the documents. The administration should only welcome “refugees who can be fully and appropriately assimilate, and are aligned with the president's objectives.”
To that end, the documents say, Mr. Trump should cancel the applications of hundreds of thousands of people who are already in the pipeline to come to the United States as refugees, many of whom have gone through extensive security checks and referrals.
And Mr. Trump's federal agencies proposed imposing limits on the number of refugees who can resettle in communities that already have a high population of immigrants, on the basis that the United States should avoid “the concentration of non-native citizens” in order to promote assimilation.
