Victor Angelescu revealed what Kyros Vassaras explained in the meeting organized by CCA: “He gave us justice”
Article by Alexandru Stanciu – published Wednesday, October 08, 2025 20:49 / Updated Wednesday, October 08, 2025 21:31
Victor Angelescu, the minority shareholder from Rapid, participated in Meeting on videoarbitage topics organized by the CCA with the representatives of the clubs in Superliga. The official of the Giulesti was declared satisfied with the initiative of Kyros Vassaras, the head of the Central Referee Commission.
Angelescu revealed that several controversial phases were analyzed this season, and in the case of Rapid, Vassaras acknowledged that a punishment shot in favor of Giulesti should have been granted in two different matches.
Victor Angelescu, according to the explanations offered by Kyros Vassaras in relation to the errors of the lime system: “He gave us justice”
“It was useful, I was pleasantly surprised by the idea, what we discussed. I had a discussion in general, in which he explained the vision of the lime system, so that we could better understand this process.
He explained certain things I didn't know. For example, I learned that, until now, since the start of the championship, in about 20% of the matches there have been technical problems related to lime.
I understood these things, that there are technical problems at certain stadiums. In Clinceni, I understand that there are very big problems. As well as in Galați, with all the lime system means. I understand that in Botosani.
He also told us about the Botoșani-UTA match that at the two goals scored by UTA from Offeaid the decisions in the Var room were not taken, the ones in the field remained. Could not be judged at lime.
This was one of the topics addressed, to understand what lime system we have. We discussed quite a lot of phases, a wide selection of litigious phases. Some were claimed by certain teams as mistakes, others, from my point of view, were not mistakes.
We discussed 3 of the 6-7 penalties not rapid. At two he gave us justice, one had another opinion. He explained his point of view, and we understood the vision.
I think that at the phase from U Cluj, at the hen from the free kick, he explained why it was not a penalty. At those with Otelul and FC Argeș he gave us justice.
He tried and explained very clearly the appearance of the hence, when it is granted and when not. He detailed the explanation a lot, went through everything that the regulation means.
Honestly, after this meeting, I left 30% smarter. I understood some of the explanations and I think it would be very beneficial to be transmitted not only to the clubs, but also to the press and the players.
Mr. Vassaras explained quite well. He admitted that there are mistakes, but I also understood that there are technical problems, which he showed us.
The sanctions of the wrong referees cannot be made public, but we can check that, when there is a mistake, the referees are no longer delegated.
In the sea, that's about it. I understand that he wants to see each other in the future. And we want to understand certain things better. Maybe it's the first time we see, at least, that there is this desire to open. Honestly, I think it was a beneficial meeting, “said Victor Angelescu, at the show” Football Club “, from Digi Sport.
