Sports

“FCSB came out of loss after exchange with Dinamo”

Article by Alexandru Barbu – published Monday, 04 August 2025, 13:20 / Updated Monday, 04 August 2025 13:24

Within the “Ioanițoaia up-to-date” section of the GSP Live show, the director of the Sports Gazette analyzed what happened important over the weekend in the 4th stage of Superliga, especially the strong matches Dinamo – FCSB 4-3 and CFR Cluj – Craiova University 2-3.

Ioanițoaia up to date: “Dinamo won on merit. FCSB NA lost because of the referees”

“I saw interesting, dramatic matches, with tense endings, with many goals, with scores and with less expected results, in the sense that Dinamo manages, after 5 years, to defeat FCSB in the championship and, as far as I am concerned, I think he beat merit.

Dinamo was the better team. It was not very discussed about the technical box, about the statistical data, but I noted them, and they are all in favor of Dinamo: 57% possession, 5-2 at corners, 7-3 for gate -ups and, interestingly, superiority at the number of passes – 402 to 311 – given that FCSB was a team that dominated its opponents precisely through possession and passes.

Kopic proposed 5 new players, including two beginners: Portarul Camerunez Epassy and central Israeli defendant Stoinov, who is not 20 years old. All the more it seemed to FCSB if you looked at Dinamo's restricted bank. I also looked here: Dinamo had 8 players on the reserve arbitration sheet, while FCSB had 12.

Of course, FCSB has been cleansed or tried to be in the perspective of the Europa Reague match with Drita, which is why not started with Chiricheș, Alibec, Miculescu, politically, which he introduced along the way. Dinamo has proven more will, more commitment and, surprisingly, more homogeneity.

Dinamo - FCSB // Photo: GSP

Cîrjan, Armstrong, Musi, Sivis were Dinamo's best players. Now there was also the lack of Olaru at FCSB, less of Târnovanu, eliminated with the lighthouse, because Zima defended well. The attack suffers, the defense suffers, the middle of the land suffers, because it is based almost exclusively on Florin Tanase. Bîrligea and Alibec are not yet in the rhythm, they were injured, they are not, I think, completely restored.

Cercel made some big mistakes, but it is very difficult to accuse a player of only 18 years. Something happens at FCSB, valid for CFR. We look: the favorites of the championship are in the play-out, even at the bottom of the play-out. The landscape of the first league is changed a little, where Craiova and, If you beat tonight, they can quickly have 10 points, while the big favorite remained at 4.

It is beginning of the season, the difference can be recovered, but there are already six points difference and too many failures next to the FCSB and CFR. At FCSB it is a mental blockage. The team does not dismember, as if it are still asleep. Cisotti was also under expectations. If we make a comparison between mies and politically, better mies, much better. From this exchange, FCSB has been losing, in my opinion, giving up the mies and taking the politics.

It is a personal point of view, I never convinced me politically, and Ioanițoaia said.

Four penalties granted a feast and, in my opinion -and not only mine -all had regulatory coverage. The most discussed was the one granted to Radunovic, who really kept with Armstrong. It was a reciprocal holding, but Armstrong started it, while Radunovic insisted. I think, from a regular point of view, he was right. Anyway, I don't think it can be said that FCSB has lost the match with Dinamo because of the arbitration

– Ovidiu Ioanițoaia

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vBnsr7cfiq

“Craiova made only interesting purchases”

“Craiova also won a deserved victory, despite the fact that, after being led by 0-3, CFR returned and made a remontada up to 2-3. But it managed to equal.

CFR does not manage the alternation between the championship matches and those in the Europa League. The four classic injured – Emerlahu, Simao, Muhar and Kamara – were added now.

I must say that the officials in Cluj accuse the pre -empty phase, the phase in which Păun was trampled by an opponent, injured, and the referee did not whistle. It is reproached for Rareș Vidican that he did not notice the foul on Păun, but especially to Ovidiu Hațegan, from the Var room, that he did not warn the Vidican on the phase.

In any case, beyond these details, it is to be emphasized the courage of Rădoi, who started with two beginners, Luca Băsceanu and Florin Stefan, just coming from Sepsi. Although it has changed more (Craiova changed nine players to the match with Sarajevo, and CFR only compared to the duel with Lugano), At least in the first half, which he clearly dominated, Craiova has proven superior.

At his first degree, the French of Congolese origin, the Nsimba's attack peak, scored two goals. Craiova made only interesting purchases. And goalkeeper Isenko looks like an excellent purchase. Again, in Gruia, he had two or three very good interventions.

Proof that, although he introduced Bancu and Băluță, Rădoi kept on the edge on Mora, Romanchuk, Cicâldău, Baiaram, Screciu – many unused holders remained. And yet, Craiova has achieved a victory and is a leader in the standings. It can be matched by Rapid, if Rapid wins tonight with Botosani ”, added the GSP director.

Ashley Davis

I’m Ashley Davis as an editor, I’m committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity and accuracy in every piece we publish. My work is driven by curiosity, a passion for truth, and a belief that journalism plays a crucial role in shaping public discourse. I strive to tell stories that not only inform but also inspire action and conversation.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button