Bolojan's first reaction in the case of Anastasiu. Deputy Prime Minister will make an announcement on Sunday

Prime Minister Ilie Bolojan reacted on Sunday, July 27, a few days after the information published in the press showed that Dragoș Anastasiu bribed an ANAF civil servant. The Deputy Prime Minister will make an announcement on Sunday, from 5 pm.

Ilie Bolojan has announced that following statements about Anastasiu's situation. Facebook photo

Located at the headquarters of the Bihor Prefecture, where he came with the executive president of UDMR Bihor, Szabo Odon, the prime minister was asked by the journalists of the Bihor publication about the scandal in which Anastasiu is involved.

“Of course you will have, until the afternoon, a statement”said Prime Minister Ilie Bolojan.

The representatives of the Government have announced that Dragoș Anastasiu will hold a press conference on Sunday at 5 pm at the Victoria Palace.

The Deputy Prime Minister also made a similar announcement on Facebook.

We recall that Deputy Prime Minister Dragoș Anastasiu is in the center of a scandal, after the press appeared that a company most owned by him concluded with an ANAF inspector, Angela Burlacu, a fictional contract, which, in reality, was a kind of monthly protection fee, to be sheltered from the ANAF controls.

The amount paid as a bribe, totaling about 150,000 euros, would have been discussed right in Anastasiu's office.

“They presented, on their own initiative, without a defender, at the DNA headquarters with a denunciation already written”

We recall that on Friday, DNA came with new details in the case of Dragoș Anastasiu Deputy Prime Minister:

“For the correct information of the public opinion on the quality of denouncing witness that a person would have in a criminal file instrumented by DNA, the Information and Public Relations Bureau is empowered to make the following details:On February 2, 2018, the two representatives of SC Touring Eurolines SA were presented, on their own initiative, without a defender, at the DNA headquarters with a denunciation already written on behalf of one of them. They were heard on the same day by the case prosecutor, attributing the quality of denunciation witnesses ”.

The quality of denunciation witness is closely linked to the useful information brought to the knowledge of the criminal prosecution body, in any form (denunciation/statement of witness), before it has been notified, DNA said.

“The comprehensive details offered by the two were used and led to the trial and, subsequently, to the conviction of the defendant Burlacu Angela Georgeta, both being considered by the case prosecutor, benefiting from the legal provisions applicable in this situation, respectively art. 290 paragraph 3 of the Criminal Code and art. is shown in the statement

The National Anticorruption Directorate also stated that “it is regrettable that, by the way some public actors misinterpret the legal provisions, a doubt is thrown on a definitive court decision that benefits from the judicial working authority.”

“In this public debate, in which the DNA was requested by the media to rule on a file that it was instrumented and which was definitively confirmed by the court, our institutional interest is exclusively for a correct presentation of the facts and legal grounds. We reject the DNA in political discussions of any kind” He said DNA, ”the DNA shows.

Anastasiu contradicts the DNA and asks for the copy of the documents: “I did not file a complaint, but I gave statements”

Saturday, July 26, Deputy Prime Minister Dragoș Anastasiu announced in a Facebook post that he asked DNA to give him a copy of “The alleged denunciation” From the file of the ANAF function, stressing that it did not make a denunciation, but only “given statements ”.

“I reiterate the fact that I did not sign and file a complaint, but I gave statements about the facts that took place”, Dragoș Anastasiu said on Saturday.

Anastasiu reported on Friday that in the corruption file regarding the officials of the ANAF he did not have “any legal advantage”, but was only a witness, stressing that he accepted the function he currently holds and because he does not want “Other Romanian entrepreneurs should be the subject of such abuse of power by some state employees. “