The complaint of gold regarding the law of “austerity”, on the table of judges from the CCR

The Constitutional Court of Romania discusses, on Tuesday, the complaint of gold regarding the law of “austerity”, adopted by committing the executive's liability.

Gold claims that “it is a toxic law, deeply unfair and deeply unconstitutional, which represents an abuse of power committed with cynicism and contempt towards Romanians and the principles that govern an authentic democracy,” writes Agerpres.

“The Government misused the procedure of committing liability to impose an heterogeneous package of measures that seriously affect millions of Romanians, without a real debate in the Parliament. The invocation of emergency is a gross false: the budget deficit did not appear overnight, and the Government had years to intervene through the normal democratic mechanisms, what does the Bolojan do. The humiliations in the same law, put it on the neck of Parliament and claim that it is “reform”. It staggers the definitive judgments – an unprecedented attack on the justice and the separation of powers in the state, the military personnel at the limit of the subsistence – clear signal are not respected neither the army nor the national dignity. Sineciuştii are walking in luxury cars paid from taxpayers' money, ”says gold.

In the opinion of this party, the law “not only is unconstitutional, is dangerous”, because “it opens the way of a government in which the Executive makes laws without parliamentary control, ignores the Constitution, ignores citizens' rights and undermines the authority of justice.”

“Gold asks the Constitutional Court to completely reject this law and to defend the fundamental principles of the rule of law. I submitted and supported in Parliament the censorship motion against the Bolojan Government, which came with this fiscal package for the poverty of the Romanians. (…) did not create the crisis. Possible democratic.

The first censorship motion faced by the government led by Ilie Bolojan from the installation was rejected on July 14 by the plenary plenary of the Parliament, registering 134 votes “for” and four votes “against”, out of a total of 138 votes expressed.

In order for the censure motion to pass, a number of 233 votes “for” was required.

The censorship motion was initiated by the opposition, after the Government has engaged in Parliament on the first package of fiscal measures, meant to reduce the budget deficit. The censorship motion was entitled “They ruined the country and now forces the Romanians to pay the payment note – outside with the hypocritical government” and was signed by 131 MPs from Aur, Pot, SOS Romania and non -affiliated.

The government has assumed responsibility in Parliament on June 7 on the first package of fiscal measures. Two days later, Gold announced the deposit of the censorship motion, on the grounds that the government “usurped the legitimate power and mocked the will to represent the Romanian people” and, as a result, “must disappear with all its propaganda, liar and toxic”.

At the debate of the censorship motion in the plenary plenary of the Parliament, Prime Minister Ilie Bolojan said that Romania already has the first positive signals regarding the economy.

“I ask the colleagues in the opposition, apart from a political exercise they have checked and understand, what is the purpose of this motion? Would they want to stop and return where we left? Much of the things that the colleagues from the opposition signal are known, others are exaggerated or in the state. That is here-to correct these shortcomings, which is why we have committed the responsibility. The solutions? ”Bolojan said.

The President of the Chamber of Deputies, the interim leader of PSD Sorin Grindeanu, claimed, in the plenary of Parliament, that Gold does not want to fall the government, because he knows very well that he has no “alternative” and “no coherent plan” for Romania.

According to the Constitution, the Executive can engage his responsibility in front of the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate, in a common meeting, on a program, a declaration of general policy or a draft law (Article 114). In the situation in which the Government was not dismissed by censorship motion, the draft law presented, modified or supplemented, as the case may be, with amendments accepted by the Executive, is considered adopted, and the application of the program or the general policy declaration becomes mandatory for the Government (Article 114 of the Constitution).