Business

The White House translates from Trump's entry. “Post on the change of regime in Iran was simply asking a question”

2025-06-23 17:00

publication
2025-06-23 17:00

Our position on changing the regime in Iran has not changed, and the Sunday entry of President Donald Trump on this subject was only asking a question that many people ask – said on Monday a spokeswoman for the White House Karoline Leavitt. Trump suggested that Iran needs a change in power.

The White House translates from Trump's entry. "Post about changing the regime in Iran was simply asking a question"
The White House translates from Trump's entry. "Post about changing the regime in Iran was simply asking a question"
photo: Carlos Barria / / Reuters / Forum

“President's attitude and army's attitude did not change. The president simply asked a question that many people ask around the world: if they refuse to get involved in diplomacy, why should the Iranian people not arise against this brutal terrorist regime?” Leavitt said in an interview with journalists in front of the White House.

The spokeswoman in this way answered the question about the President's Sunday post on Truth Social, in which he suggested that Iran needs a change of regime.

“Using the term + change of regime + is not politically correct, but if the current Iranian regime is not able to make Iran great again, why shouldn't the regime change? that the US goal is not to change the regime.

When asked about Trump's earlier suggestions, who said that the US could kill the leader of Iran Ajatollah Ali Chamenei, but they would not do it yet, Leavitt said that “he did not want to speak before the president” in this matter.

In a Monday interview with Fox News, the president's spokeswoman also maintained that the USAn USA on Iranian nuclear installations was very effective and that the bombed centers had Iranian supplies of highly enriched uranium.

“We have a high level of certainty that where these strokes took place, highly enriched uranium was stored,” she said. “The president would not start attacks if we were not sure. So this operation was a great success,” she added.

Her words contradict what the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency Rafael Grossi, who told the New York Times, that Iran moved uranium reserves from Saturday's strokes.

On Sunday, JD Vance Vice President also suggested that Iran still has significant supplies of material needed for the structure of nuclear weapons, but he has no way to enrich it to the appropriate level.

“We will work in the coming weeks to make sure that we will do something with this fuel, and this is one of the things we will talk about with the Iranians. But we know that they no longer have the opportunity to transform this supply of highly enriched uranium into uranium required for the production of nuclear weapons, and this was really our goal,” said Vance in an interview with ABC television.

Although the chairman of the college of combined bosses of the staffs of General Dan Caine stated that it is too early to describe the full effects of Saturday bombing, only talking about serious damage, Trump and Leavitt argued that the term “total and total leveling with the land” Iranian objects used by Trump is accurate.

From Washington Oskar Górzyński (PAP)

OSK/ MAL/

Ashley Davis

I’m Ashley Davis as an editor, I’m committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity and accuracy in every piece we publish. My work is driven by curiosity, a passion for truth, and a belief that journalism plays a crucial role in shaping public discourse. I strive to tell stories that not only inform but also inspire action and conversation.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button