“Due to the information on possible irregularities in the public space in the public space, the activities of the electoral commissions, consisting in the deficiencies in counting votes cast in the presidential election or incorrect fulfillment of voting protocols, the Supreme Court informs, the Supreme Court informs, that such situations may formulate the formulation of allegations in electoral protests “ – informs the Supreme Court.
“The applicant who wanted to bring an election protest for the reasons described above must formulate the above -described allegations corresponding to the disposal of Article 82 § 1 of the Civil Code, justify them, as well as present or indicate evidence or indicate their support” – We read in a statement.
Later in the Supreme Court, it informs what actions can be taken as a result of complex protests.
“When recognizing protests questioning the determination of the results of voting or the result of the election The Supreme Court may allow evidence from the inspection of electoral cards, in practice, leading to a similar effect as recalculating cards ” – informs SN.
“As a rule, the Supreme Court orders such evidence to a good District Court as part of an appeal to grant court assistance. Then the District Court, not the Supreme Court, takes evidence at the meeting, as the result of which the Supreme Court informs” – we read in the statement.
Read also: Donald Tusk about the elections: “Forgery are examined and will be punished”
“Submission of the highest protest free from formal deficiencies, in which correctly formulated allegations regarding irregularities in regional election committees were concluded, and evidence has been presented or indicated for this circumstance, opens the way to their substantive examination, as a result of which the Supreme Court may express the opinion that the protest is justified or unfounded. In the event of an opinion on the legitimacy of the allegations of protest, the Supreme Court indicates whether the irregularities found had an impact on the result of the election ” – informs the Supreme Court.
