Two players from FCSB, to committees after the match with Craiova? »” Coincidences or dubious situations “
Article by Maria Olteanu – published on Tuesday, April 15, 2025, 19:15 / Updated Tuesday, April 15, 2025 7:15 pm
Sorin Cârțu (69 years old), the honorary president of Craiova University, analyzed the statements made by Florin Tănase and Stefan Târnovanu, after the match on Sunday evening, finished equality, score 0-0the two complaining about the arbitration at the end of the confrontation in stage #4 of the superliged play-off.
-
“They had a big opportunity and with a little help. Many easy fouls for them, for us. They deserved a red and more faults granted around their corner.” This is, “said Florin Tanase, after the match;
-
“They complained all week, I am a person reading the press, I saw pressures on their part. I think they did, they came out. The arbitration was 100%on their side,” said Stefan Târnovanu.
After these two statements, Cârțu asked if the two players from FCSB has now been called to the disciplinary commission because they had heavy dissatisfaction and messages to the arbitration, in the context that in the week before the confrontation. it complained of some arbitration decisions And it was announced that he would be called to give explanations for the statements made.
Sorin Cârțu, after Craiova – FCSB: “I do not want anyone's evil, but they are very subjective statements”
“(No – I saw two very harsh statements of the players from FCSB) What does it mean? Will they be called by the disciplinary commission. It is a clear attack on the referee. How does everyone send us to the commissions, so you look at these statements. I do not want anyone's evil, but there are very subjective statements.
If they say at this match that we were advantageous and that we would not have deserved to win, you realize their power of analysis. I do not stay now to enter the controversy with Tanase and Târnovanu. Why do I call me to the commissions? Because I said about hierarchies and tricky arbitration? I have what to prove to them, they are “n” phases.
If you see that three times in a row, it is costly and intervenes, it does not intervene in favor of the same team, you ask yourself some questions. Are they coincidences or dubious situations?
To go out on the television a spokesman for them and tell us why he did not give the second yellow to Ngezana at that phase. Let's see what the reasons are. Let's see what we saw and what they saw, “said Sorin Cârțu, quoted by Fanatik.ro.
The ranking in the superliged play-off
