The one-page materials, delivered to European capitals in recent weeks, are intended to present a vision of the participation of American companies in the reconstruction of Ukraine, as well as in investments in key sectors of the Russian economy.
Some of these assumptions, as reported by officials quoted by “WSJ”, aroused surprise and caution among European partners who they fear that the proposals may weaken the current common strategy towards Moscow.
Read also: There is a Fed decision on US interest rates
The rest of the text below the video
Controversial US plans for Ukraine. This is Donald Trump's idea for Russia
One of the main points of the American annexes is to be use of approximately USD 200 billion Russian assets frozen in Europe. According to the plan, these funds would be directed to projects in the area Ukraine, which would not only support the reconstruction of the country, but also strengthen the presence of American companies in the region.
Read also: Donald Trump spoke on the elections in Ukraine. “I'm wondering”
Examples of projects include a proposal to build a huge data center powered by the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant, which is currently under Russian occupation.. European decision-makers, however, have different expectations towards the frozen assets – they would like to use them primarily to purchase weapons for Ukraine and ensure its government's financial stability. However, this was not what aroused the greatest emotions.
Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin during a meeting in Alaska
|
GettyImages
The American plan also envisages investments in Russian strategic sectors, such as the extraction of rare earth elements and the exploration of oil deposits in the Arctic. According to the documents American companies would play a key role in these endeavors while supporting the return of Russian energy to Western markets.
Europe reacts with distrust to Donald Trump's plan. Strong words were spoken
As reported by “WSJ”, the proposals have raised serious concerns among European officials. Some of them, even though they had seen the documents, were not sure whether to take all the ideas seriously. One interviewee compared energy plans to economic version of “Yalta”, suggesting that they could resemble the division of spheres of influence from the mid-20th century. Another said that some parts of the documents sound as fantastic as Trump's earlier idea to build a riviera in the Gaza Strip.
The main fear of European partners, however, is the potential side effect of enabling Russia to rebuild its economic and military strength. Unblocking energy exports could give Moscow the necessary breathing space in the long term, and this, according to officials, could lead to a renewed strengthening of its geopolitical position.
According to the Wall Street Journal the dispute over the US proposals promises difficult negotiations in the coming weeks. The divergence of interests between Washington and European capitals leaves the future of the plan — as well as the fate of Russian assets — open.
