The last grade received by Ciprian Deac as a player » Who is the repeater for anti-football in CFR Cluj

Yanis Pîrvu (80') and Alin Fică (86') were the scorers of the duel that opened the stage. Cluj ends the season in third place, while Pitesti remain the leaders of the hierarchy.

Who made the difference and who remained in the shadows? We analyze the performances of all the players and give the marks after the match in Gruia.

Cluj's scores in the match with FC Argeș

• Rareș Gal (grade 6) – Decent performance on Superliga debut. At the goal he conceded, he left the impression that he could have made a better dive.

• Viktor Kun (grade 5) – He didn't go up the flank, immobile and defensive, outmaneuvered many times.

• Matei Ilia (grade 7) – Safe evolution, very attentive, with good pass and forward all the time. Blocked the opposing attack every time.

• Marian Huja (grade 5) – Overtaken by Yanis Pîrvu very easily in the goal phase. Heavy in action, but also in initiative. He lacks attention in important moments, it's more and more obvious.

• Aly Abeid (grade 6) – It gave security to the defense. And he, non-existent in the opposing half, did not help the construction in any way.

• Alin Fica (grade 8) – Even if he was shy throughout the game, he appears with a good shot and scores simply, perpendicular to the eagles' butts. Brave, determined and decisive. Pancu can't fault him for anything.

• Ovidiu Perianu (grade 5) – Inaccurate in his actions, he connected hard with Fică, but also with Şfaiț, on the flank. Millstone in the railroad game.

• Andres Şfaiț (note 6) – There were high expectations from him in this match. He lacked the dynamism, but also the energy from the beginning of the season.

• Ciprian Deac (his last grade, 8) – It was about him, he scored from a superb lob, but the pennant opposed him. For execution and more, it deserves credit from whoever entered. Excited, fouled hard, “in control” a few times, he gritted his teeth and saw his game, even if the sprint is not what it used to be. Time forgives no one. Thanks, Cyprus!

• Adrian Păun (grade 7) – Active, eager to succeed, came close to opening the scoring in the first half. In the second half, he lacked energy.

• Luka Zahovic (grade 5) – Didn't pivot, didn't create space, absent in ball movement.

• Daniel Pancu (grade 6) – He didn't aim for much in his last match on the CFR bench. Training the team when there was no stake was a challenge.

Along the way they also entered:

• Lorenzo Biliboc (62', score 5) – Energetic, but did not produce, did not serve his colleagues.

• Meriton Korenica (62', score 5) – Active and non-productive at the same time. No rush, no sprint, no aim.

• Alibek Aliev (62', score 6) – On the same note as the others introduced along the way. A plus is the goal assist for Fica.

• Răzvan Gligor (81') – He evolved too little to be graded.

• Andrei Cordea (83') – He evolved too little to be graded.

The scores of the Argesians in the match with CFR Cluj

• Cătălin Straton (grade 4) – To waste time in the 38th minute, with the score 0-0, is the total anti-football. Don't let the children who want to become goalkeepers watch the goalkeeper of the Argesans!

• Dorinel Oancea (note 6) – Much too defensive, crossed the half of the field a few times.

• Mario Tudose (note 6) – Did not connect very well in defense, slightly tired, with heavy passing.

• Guilherme Garutti (note 7) – Attentive, able to climb, eager for more. This is how each component of the team had to play to win all the points.

• Leard Sadriu (grade 6) – The same situation as in the case of Oancea. He didn't propose, he didn't bring the team forward. You guard against the void, the void comes.

• Robert Sierra (grade 6) – In theory, the liaison between the two departments. In reality, shy to pass forward.

• Xian Emmers (grade 5) – Deleted, no initiative. A play-no-maker. Totally unproductive.

• Vadim Rață (grade 5) – Too many steps back, although the opposing defense played a very low game.

• Ionuț Rădescu (grade 6) – Inert to Kun, also a weak link in the band. Basically, two opponents who canceled themselves out by doing nothing.

• Michael Idowu (grade 5) – Just over an innings for him. He didn't prove anything.

• Ricardo Matos (grade 5) – A non-existent peak in the game for 63 minutes.

• Bogdan Andone (grade 6) – At the end of the season, he had a difficult task in qualifying the team, although with a win he could still hope for 5th place, pending the Rapid game. An extra noise after returning from the cabins and that's about it.

Along the way they also entered:

• Yanis Pîrvu (52', score 7) – Superb execution, desire and freshness. A player of great perspective for the people of Arges.

• Takayuki Seto (63', score 5) – He didn't bring balance or offensive input. One player in number, in Gruia.

• Kevin Brobbey (64', score 4) – Serves Pîrvu well, but completely stupidly leaves his team outnumbered. Until then, deleted.

• Mario Marin (90+3') – He evolved too little to be graded.

• Iulian Moldovan (90+3') – He evolved too little to be graded.

The performance of referees

• Horia Mladinovici – grade 7. He left the game open, communicated well with the assistants, especially during the phase of the goal scored from offside by Deac.

• Mihăita Necula and Bianca Florea (assistants) – note 7 – No problems

• Claudiu Marcu and Iulian Dima (in the VAR room) – note 7 – No interventions.