LifestyleOther

“I couldn’t come because there was shelling in Ukraine.” HACS appeal rejected Mindich's attempt to overturn suspicion


According to the CPC, at the meeting the businessman’s lawyers asked to ensure Mindich’s participation via videoconference. The defense explained his non-arrival by the fact that “shelling continues in Ukraine,” and the criminal proceedings, according to the lawyer, allegedly have signs of “political persecution.”

“As soon as fears for life and health no longer exist, he is ready to come and communicate,” lawyer Mindich is quoted as saying at the center.

The panel of judges consisting of Sergei Bodnar, Daniela Chernenkaya and Igor Panaid decided to refuse the petition.

The CPC noted that the court explained this by the fact that Mindich is wanted, no grounds have been provided that would prevent his personal participation in the meeting, and it is also impossible to reliably establish his identity during an online connection.

The court also refused to satisfy the appeal on the merits and upheld the decision of the Supreme Court to refuse to cancel the report of suspicion.

Ashley Davis

I’m Ashley Davis as an editor, I’m committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity and accuracy in every piece we publish. My work is driven by curiosity, a passion for truth, and a belief that journalism plays a crucial role in shaping public discourse. I strive to tell stories that not only inform but also inspire action and conversation.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button