Article by Adrian Duţă – published on Tuesday, September 23, 2025 20:33 / Updated Tuesday, September 23, 20:52
Former referee Marius Avram analyzed the controversial phase from the end of the match Steel – Craiova University 1-0, When the Moldovans asked for a hit from 11 meters for a possible hen.
In the 90+3 minute, Mihnea Rădulescu sent a dangerous center in the Galatians. The ball was rejected by Neicu, the one who seemed to have committed hen.
Although the Oltenians asked for a penalty, the “central” Horațiu Fennic did not give a penalty. From the Var room could not be able to intervene over the referee on the ground, the phase being a unclear one.
Marius Avram believes that the fennel made the correct decision, given the resumptions with the phase. The failure in Galați was the first for Craiova University this superlig season. The Oltenians remained leaders, with 23 points in 10 stages.
Marius Avram: “I would say” let the game continue “”
“From what is seen first the player comes to the hip. He was his hand away from the body, but he comes to his hip. If he touches his hand later, I can't say. It's very hard to say.
It's hard for me to pronounce myself. It seems to come to her hip. It's another item. If it comes in hand, the ball does not go up. If it comes to the hip, it has logic to go up.
He tries to block the center, but also to pull his hand. That's the way it seems. From here it is very difficult. If he has a contact between his hand and ball I say he would have taken it down, not up. It doesn't make sense. I'm trying to figure it out. The images are not clear. I would say “let the game continue”, said Marius Avram, according to digisport.ro.
Photo gallery. Controversial phase of Steel – Craiova
