Article by Maria Olteanu – published on Saturday, September 13, 2025, 00:01 / Updated on Saturday, September 13, 2025 00:05
Victor Angelescu (41 years old), the minority shareholder from Rapid, intervened on Friday evening, after his team drew, Score 0-0, on the field of those from the University of Cluj. He was extremely disappointed that the Giulesti were deprived of a penalty at the end of the match.
In the 88th minute, Antoine Baroan was made by Cisse, and Rapid received a free kick from the edge of the box. At the execution of the fixed phase, Christensen shot at the long corner, and the ball was rejected by Artean, in the wall, by hand. The “central” of the match, Florin Andrei, did not dictate a penalty, considering that one cannot talk about hen.
After the match, Angelescu was extremely dissatisfied that Rapid did not receive a penalty, claiming that there is a filming, made from behind the gate, in which it is clear that the ball was reached with the hand of artean and that the correct decision would have been a penalty.
He told his dissatisfaction and insisted that, since the season began, Rapid has not received any penalty, although he should have benefited from seven and be a leader.
Victor Angelescu, live accusations: “Battle of play. At more of the European Cups we are not left”
“At all, I have no way to be satisfied, I think I had much bigger opportunities, two big opportunities. I looked on all the pictures and it is a penalty as much as the house, big, big, it is a penalty anywhere on this earth, anywhere. It is clear, we have the filming, and from the back, and from the side, no one.
Nelutu Sabău will come out and he will tell us how the water was invented. It is the 7th penalty in 9 stages we do not receive. Maybe we're not wanting, I'm totally disappointed.
I gave a message above the federation, to the league. We can't help but have a penalty in 9 stages. In vain we are in the second place, we had to be in the 1st place. With Botosani Henț clear, here clear hens. I send you the filming, it is not a clear penalty, it is 100%clear, I have no doubt, I send you the shoot behind the gate, it is clear.
The phase is difficult (the one from which the free kick resulted), that's why I don't mean. I do not know if he has been holding or in contact from the outside. It's not a clear matter, I try to be more reserved, and there could be a penalty, but beyond it is very clear the hence phase.
Balanced match, I think, in which, as I said, I had the bigger opportunities. A balanced match between two play-off teams, which went to an equal without the respective phases. We had bigger opportunities, I'm sorry we didn't win.
Today, 51%, we would have been worth the victory, but it is a good result, we remain undefeated, we try to fight for the first places. Maximum we can go to the European cups, at more we will not be left, I think. Borza will stay 4-5 weeks, “said Victor Angelescu, at the show” Football Club “, from Digi Sport.
Video with phase: Rapid asked for a penalty after keeping Cisse on Baroan. Then to the ball touched by the artean by hand
Superliga standings
