Rafał Trzaskowski and Karol Nawrocki revealed the data of Mr. Jerzy. Uodo punished them


During the presidential debate between Karol Nawrocki and Rafał Trzaskowski, which took place on Monday, May 12, The president of the capital handed the candidate to the candidate. During the debate, he did not reveal what was inside. The candidate of the Civic Coalition explained this only the next day in social media.
“In the envelope, which I gave to Karol Nawrocki during the debate, there was the account number of the Nursing Home, in which Mr. Jerzy is today. In the same envelope there was also one simple quote:” If you do not know how to behave, behave decently “” – he wrote, joining a photo of the envelope. The problem is that it was visible on him the name of Mr. Jerzy and the name of the DPS in which he stayed.
- Return in the DPS of Mr. Jerzy. We know how the residents voted
UODO took a closer look at the Committee of Karol Nawrocki
UODO also initiated proceedings against the staff of Karol Nawrocki, which on May 12 on the YouTube platform published the film “Find out how this story looks really. Necessarily to the end”.
“There was not only Mr. Jerzy's data, but information about his private life, health, family and financial problems, as well as problems with the law” – we read in the UODO message.
- Financing the Trzaskowski campaign under the magnifying glass. The prosecutor's office spoke
UODO punished the committees of Rafał Trzaskowski and Karol Nawrocki
According to Business Insider, Łukasz Kuligowski from the UODO Department of Social Communication, the head of the office issued an administrative decision administering the election committees of Rafał Trzaskowski and Karol Nawrocki.
Trzaskowski's committee explained that Mr. Jerzy's data was not anonymized because of the “error of publishing and rush”. The data was deleted from the profile in May 2025.
In turn, the Committee of the PiS supported by the PiS explained, among others, that “Nawrocki was forced to protect his vital interests and realize the legitimate interest that expressed themselves in defense of their good name.”
UODO's decision is not final. Both committees have 30 days to appeal against her.




