The worthy reaction of a teenager assaulted by a traveler in a tram, praised by the Internet users: “Judge to arrive!”
A teenager who climbed the bike in a tram was assaulted by a traveler, disturbed that he does not take place because of the vehicle. The boy replied that he is the victim of an aggression.
Child assaulted by a photo traveler: video capture
The post called “Two generations, two education, two understanding ” It was published on social networks and has gone viral. A traveler grabbed the helmet and pulls it, addressing the insult because he got a bicycle on the bus. He responds to her that he has no right to get his hands on him and that in the means of transport there are surveillance cameras, who will reach the police.
The dialogue between the child and the woman:
“Child: I do not close any mouth, do not put my hand on me! You have no right to get my hands on me! One shooting, two filming …
-Femeie: I'm … Pi* on me …
-Copil: My mother? Insult, harassment, destruction of goods, fine, verbal and physical aggression … Say “, the child lists the crimes.
“How naughty”, says another traveler, who attends the scene between the child and the woman who insults and agrees.
At one point, another traveler intervenes and appeared to the boy.
Internet: I hope to act legally, our generation had to shut up in the past for this!
The post has aroused many opinions in the online environment. Most Internet users claim that the boy has done correctly and knows his rights.
“I see opinions and opinions here. On the bus, tram, trains, you are allowed to climb a bicycle. Of course there is room for this, in the video would be that place. So the boy has shown common sense and legislative knowledge, did not offend and was not aggressive. As for the generation,«Ceausist»it is sad to react in public and to a minor ”, wrote an Internetaut
“If the driver allowed the child to get a bicycle on the bus, it means it is allowed, so the boy «Don't eat the dogs in the traitor!» Bravo to him, judge to arrive !!! ”, someone else wrote.
“The child is not guilty. He is assaulted. Why doesn't the driver intervene?”, Another Internet wonders.
“I like how he defends his right, the child. It is seen that he is educated as he chooses his words. He did not swear or offended, although he was challenged. As for the lady … please, «lady» It is a lot said ”, wrote a person.
“I hope to act legally, our generation had to shut up in the past. Now I hope measures are taken for this. As long as the driver agreed when he climbed, the travelers have no right to do such a thing! The child is right and has been civilized! to violence“Added another Internet.
