2025-06-25 18:45
publication
2025-06-25 18:45
Until Wednesday afternoon, about 53 thousand received the Supreme Court. 900 protests against the election of the President of the Republic of Poland – Monika Drwal from the press team of the Supreme Court informed PAP on Wednesday. Many protests are combined for joint diagnosis in individual matters.
Among them, the Supreme Court has previously found three protests justified, but without affecting the result of the election. They concerned individual matters of individual voters – including violations in connection with their voting certificates outside the place of residence.
However, 187 election protests were left without further running. This means that the protest for formal reasons cannot be recognized in substance.
Irregularities in as many as 1,482 regional election committees?
Such a decision – to leave without further running – was made, among others With regard to the election protest recently described in the media dealing with statistical analyzes of dr Krzysztof Kontka. The allegation suffered by him in the protest was based on – as the author of the protest pointed out – a scientific analysis, which, in his opinion, indicated the occurrence of electoral anomalies divided into various categories.
As the Monday “Gazeta Wyborcza” wrote, the study of the context “was conducted independently and financed by the author.” According to its results, irregularities could occur in 1 thousand. 482 regional election committees, which could translate into 315-487 thousand. additional votes for Karol Nawrocki.
Jacek Dubois became the representative of the context, who announced the exploration of this protest to the Supreme Court. “And let it even be open to everyone. Let the television come, film and see how it is done” – said the context on TVN24.
The application was to be submitted on Wednesday. MEC. However, Dubois informed on Platform X that the Extraordinary and Public Affairs Chamber of SN “worked quickly and on Wednesday morning he recognized his election protest at the closed session, leaving him without further running.” “The Chamber does not want to find out about anomalies in committees,” Dubois said.
The decision on the protest was confirmed by PAP Monika Drwal from the SN press team on Wednesday.
In turn, PG spokeswoman Anna Adamiak informed on Wednesday that the Prosecutor General – in the positions of the Supreme Court in connection with the protest brought by the context, as well as a protest brought by Joanna Staniszkis – he requested a inspection of voting cards in 1,000. 472 regional election committees. Staniszkis protest, according to the data in the database on the Supreme Court website, awaits the date of diagnosis.
Electoral protests are usually recognized implicitly, but the court may also decide to meet. For example, the protest is to be explicitly recognized this Friday, in connection with which the Supreme Court ordered the examination of electoral cards from 13 regional electoral commissions.
How does the SN consider election protests?
Monday, June 16, was the last day for submitting protests against the SN of the president's election. Protests flowed into the Supreme Court for the next week, because this granting until June 16 inclusive – through Poczta Polska – was tantamount to bringing it to the Supreme Court.
The SN recognizes protests in the composition of three judges, in non -litigious proceedings. After recognizing the protest, he can leave it without further running. This means that the protest for formal reasons cannot be recognized in substance.
If the protest is recognized in substance, the Supreme Court may express the opinion that the protest is: unfounded or justified. “In the event of an opinion on the legitimacy of the allegations of protest, the Supreme Court indicates whether the irregularities found had an impact on the result of the election” – said the Supreme Court.
After examining all protests, based on the report on the election presented by the PKW, the Supreme Court, in the composition of the entire Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs, decides on the validity of the election of the President of the Republic of Poland. The resolution in this case is collapsed at an open meeting within 30 days of making the results of the election to the public.
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court announced in a statement that the meeting regarding the adoption of a resolution regarding the validity of the election was designated for July 1 this year.
Prosecutor General Adam Bodnar said last week that the judgments issued by the judges of the Extraordinary Control Chamber will not be able to be considered an independent and impartial way. He added that the judges of the Supreme Court Chamber should rule on election protests and the validity of the election.
And the President of the Supreme Court Małgorzata Manowska assessed that all public statements that undermine the constitutional competences of the Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs of the Supreme Court to decide on the validity of the election of the President of the Republic of Poland result from ignorance of the law or are motivated by the intention of political destabilization. (PAP)
Nl/ MJA/ SDD/
