Lia Savonea, the only candidate for the head of the JCCJ. What measures propose to improve the image of the supreme court
Lia Savonea proposes in her management project for the head of the JCCJ “a justice for people”, with measures to ensure predictability, standardization of judicial decisions, accelerated unification of jurisprudence and improving the ICCJ image.
PHOTO Inquam Photos / George Călin
Lia Savonea emphasizes in the management project submitted for her candidacy to the head of the JCCJ, that “substance measures” is needed, not a “surface polish” to improve the ICCJ image.
“The objectives and steps that I assume in fulfilling the managerial prerogatives will be circumscribed to the idea that, in my opinion, materializes the meaning of the regulations of judicial organization: a justice for people. (…) Justice is for people, with people, for the normal course of society”writes the judge in the management plan.
Savonea proposes to strengthen the organizational capacity of the JCCJ, in order to achieve the objectives and appreciate that the format of the judgments requires a minimum standardization.
The confusion between the role of the accuser and that of the judge seriously affects confidence in the act of justice. – Lia Savonea, candidate the head of the JCCJ
“In the criminal matter, for example, we find that, frequently in the public space, the failures of the prosecutors for the weak indictments, the insufficient evidence or the defective criminal investigations are imposed on the court. The confusion between the accuser and that of the judge seriously affects the confidence in the act of justice. The court, but on the contrary reflects the application of the principle of presumption of innocence and the standard of evidence ”writes the judge in the project.
Savonea also emphasizes that “Not only the format of the judgments requires to be subjected to a procedural rigor, but also that of the requisition in criminal matters, or civil actions and adjacent requests in civil matters. When an indictment covers 800 pages (or even 4000 sometimes), or, in the case of civil actions, tens or even hundreds of such pages, the judicial act is exposed to the dilatory effect from the beginning, as well as some disproportionate and unnecessary costs ”.
Another reference is related to the accelerated unification of the jurisprudence, by extending and strengthening the existing mechanisms (appeal in the interest of the law, prior notification), but also by developing the national network for the unification of the jurisprudence and the establishment of a group of harmonization of the judicial practice.
At the same time, it mentions the reorganization of the completions of five judges in criminal matters, in order to ensure the coherence of the solutions and to avoid the fragmentation of the decisions.
