Trump's compromise. The breakthrough report turned out to be full of distortions


The report contains quotes from scientific papers that do not exist, references to the wrong authors, and many content contains infallible signs that they were prepared using the OPENAI cottage – says the Washington daily.
The document “The Maha Report: Making Our Children Healthy Again,” (MAHA report: Make our children again healthy) refers to the slogan of Kennedy Making America Healthy Again – make America healthy again – which in turn is a reference to the main slogan of President Donald Trump: Make America Great Again – make America again.
The report was prepared by the Commission of the Health Ministry under the leadership of Kennedy himself, who – as he reminds “WP” – became famous for his reference to distorted data or scientific arrangements.
The document is quoted, for example, by a study entitled “Excessive use of oral corticosteroids in children with asthma,” but such a test does not exist. Nearly half of the item in the report's bibliography contains links to articles or research, but from the initial analysis of “WP” shows that at least 21 of these links are “dead”.
A gigantic slip -up of Trump's man. The White House explains
When asked about non -existent scientific work, which the authors of the report refer to, the spokeswoman for the White House Karoline Leavitt said that there were “some problems with the formatting of the document, but” this does not undermine his substance “, and in addition” this is one of the most groundbreaking health reports that was made available by the Federal Government. ” Leavitt also added that the document was prepared on the basis of “good science, which was not previously recognized by the federal government.”
From the original version of the report, posted on the side of the White House, on Thursday afternoon quotes and links were removed testifying to the use of the GPT cottage, and in the night of Thursday to Friday corrections to other content were introduced.
The president of the non-profit organization of the science center in the public interest, Peter Lurie, announced that the report contains data sets prepared by its center, but they were assigned to health and agriculture departments.
“WP” also reminds that he wrote earlier that “the document exceeds the boundaries of science, drawing some conclusions”, and many of its fragments contain “misleading representations of the arrangements from scientific articles”.




