The proof of video Nicușor Dan is against the decision of the RCC, but the counselor put by the president to repair the country's budget said: “Let us get rid of this stupidity with the declaration of wealth put in public”
Nicușor Dan and Dragoș Anastasiu
In a show at Primanews, on May 26, Dragoș Anastasiu, counselor in Cotroceni under Ilie Bolojan and now under Nicușor Dan, advocated for the transition “somewhere, as a service secret” of the statements of dignitaries. On May 29, the Constitutional Court of Romania decided that the spouses/spouses be excluded from the statements of wealth.
Presidential counselor Dragoș Anastasiu is, along with Radu Burnete, the one who deals with the Presidential Administration, what President Nicușor Dan has named “The only thing that concerns me now: the budget deficit”. Anastasiu and Burnete work, starting on Thursday, May 29, along with the representatives of the parties on the Romanian budget, to propose a low -cost budget solution to the new government.
What the Constitutional Court has decided
Also on Thursday, May 29, the Constitutional Court of Romania decided that the statements of wealth and interests will no longer be published on the website of the National Integrity Agency (ANI), and these statements no longer have to include the revenues and goods of the spouses.
Basically, by this decision, which is final and mandatory, the statements of wealth and interests will be kept secret.
Statements of wealth and interests should not include the goods and revenues of the spouses, the CCR decided. Was declared unconstitutional and the article that provides for the publication on ANI-Document / Explanations of the Court and Reactions
According to the RCC, statements of wealth and interests will no longer be published on the websites of other public institutions, where those who have to declare their assets, because the “right to the protection of privacy” are violated.
The decision of the constitutional judges will produce effects for the future and does not concern the statements of wealth and interests filed before the publication of the decision in the Official Gazette of Romania.
Dragoș Anastasiu: “Dom'le, but what are you interested in how many jewelry I have in the house?”
Three days ago, Dragoș Anastasiu was invited to Primanews. There, he made a broad statement, which profit cited after the CCR decision. “Let's get rid of this stupidity with the declaration of wealth put in public. Does no one tell you not to have a statement of wealth submitted to a state institution. Dom'le, but what interests you how many jewelry do I have in the house? What are you interested?”
He motivated his opinion, based on the idea that transparency in wealth statements are why valuable people do not enter politics.
“And I know a lot of people who say, dom'le, I would go (in the public sector-no), but to make a statement of wealth … and not to do, I put it public … I do not go! So yes-a statement of wealth, yes-filed as a service secret …”, said the counselor of Nicușor Dan. Anastasiu is not paid.
Dragoș Anastasiu's full statements can be followed here.
According to the description on the website of the Presidential Administration, Dragoș Anastasiu is an honorary counselor of the President of Romania for the relationship with the business environment, within the Department of Economic and Social Policy.
Nicușor Dan: “In contradiction with an essential principle of democracy – transparency in the exercise of public functions”
In contrast, the President of Romania said on Thursday, after the RCC decision, that “the surprising decision of the Constitutional Court announced today is in contradiction with an essential principle of democracy – transparency in the exercise of public functions,” Nicușor Dan wrote. The reaction came quickly, in a message published on the president's Facebook page.
Nicușor Dan criticizes the decision of the CCR by which the wealth of the dignitaries are secreted
“The access of citizens to information on the statements of wealth of dignitaries is a guarantee of integrity and responsibility in the public space, and this principle must be defended firmly,” said the head of state.
“If the motivation of the decision identifies the technical deficiencies within the current legislative framework, it is the responsibility of the Parliament to correct them with speed,” concluded Nicușor Dan.
