The decision of the RCC to secrete the assets of the dignitaries gives birth to controversy: “Revolving! If they will have a private life, not to hold public functions”

The CCR decision that escapes politicians to publish wealth statements has aroused heated debates in the online environment.

The CCR believes that the publication of the spouse's wealth is unconstitutional. Photo: Mediafax

Romanians debate intensely on the Reddit platform the decision of the CCR which has the effect on the one hand, the elimination of the obligation to publish the declarations of wealth, and on the other, the obligation to include in the declaration of wealth of the revenues and goods of the spouses and children.

According to Law no. 176/2010 regarding the integrity in the exercise of public functions and dignities, must submit and publish the following categories:

1.. Dignitors and civil servants

The President of Romania

Members of Parliament (senators and deputies)

Government members (Ministers, Secretaries and State Subsecretaries)

Prefects and sub -prefects

Mayors and deputy mayors

Local and county councilors

Leaders of central and local public authorities and institutions

Directors of National State Autonomous Companies and Autonomous

2. Magistrates and auxiliary personnel from justice

Judges, prosecutors

Specialized auxiliary staff (clerks, legal advisers, etc.)

Members of the Superior Council of Magistracy

3.

Leaders of public institutions (rectors, deans, school principals, hospitals, etc.)

Members of the Board of Directors or of the Board of Directors of Autonomous Administration and State Companies

4. Other categories

People with control, inspection, authority or public funds.

“Congratulations years”

One of the most interesting comments refers to the reaction of the National Integrity Agency (ANI): “First of all, I am amazed that ANI has taken an attitude in this phase. Congratulations!”

“Secondly, Parliament could quickly make a new text, only changed a little, to maintain this obligation. The CCR decisions no longer have effects if the law changes.” – showed the network user.

Another commentator cites from the ANI decision to explain why the publication of statements of wealth and interests does not violate the right to private life, according to several decisions of the European Court of Human Rights:

“In the Wypych case against Poland (October 25, 2005, the request no. 2428/05), the European Court of Human Rights rejected the complaint of a member of a local council in Poland, who refused to submit the declaration of wealth, arguing that the obligation to disclose details on its financial situation and the portfolio of property imposed by the European law. The Court found that the obligation to submit its online statement and publication has indeed an interference in the right to private life, but that it was justified and that the comprehensive sphere of information to be declared was not considered overly burdensome. “

“The additional obligation to declare information on property, including marital property, can be considered reasonable, insofar as it is meant to discourage attempts to hide goods by simply acquiring them using the name of the husband/wife of a counselor” – The ECHR shows.

“The studies carried out by the World Bank have shown that at the level of 2020 there were over 160 countries that introduced systems on declarations of wealth and interests“ – it is shown in the post.

“I know there is a lot to read, but who leaves kilometer comments on how the CCR decision is correct on the grounds that “why would I publish what salary I earn at multinational” it would be best to inform what standard in this field and in the world” – concluded the person who commented.

“As if someone forces you to run for a public position.”

“The salaries in the state are publicly public, even outside the statements of wealth”, Another commentator intervened. Another one explained: “But it's not about that salary. Specifically you want to follow that X is chosen and has a great wealth and after 5 years is not Y*100 “.

“It is absolutely pork with a private life. As if someone forces you to run for a public position. 0 transparent, anyway they stole with all those statements but at least now they do not sign on lies.”

Some commentators, like the policeman-influencer Marian Godina claim that the CCR decision is welcome: “People who have life partners who are budget are right. I do not think that the secretary from the Cucuietii City Hall in the hill is a public person. But look, that secretary must submit the declaration of wealth. And it will continue to submit it … so much that you don't pass there and the revenue of your husband and children. ”

“That's how you complain as if wealth statements have been forbidden. Any years there are still, statements of wealth will be submitted that until now … so years to do their job ” – support someone else.

“Hey CCR, do something revolting”

“Although everyone is tired according to the phenomena of the last elections, I think the world should remain united against these abuses”- someone commented.

A user quoted on journalist Ovidiu Vanghele: “The CCR has released today, de facto, Romania from the European Union ”.

“The Parliament, in its wisdom, follows to modify the law so as to become constitutionally the legal text and re -enter, de facto, in the European Union ”, replied another user.

“If you have received in the last year any income from a project with European or national funds forced to submit the declarations of wealth and interests. This includes all the properties with complete address, income from salaries, rents, prizes, agricultural activities, gifts from relatives, daytime, pensions. Manufacturing and the method of acquisition. If you have children, their previous year's salary and the employer. said a commentator.

“The simple solution is: all the employees in the state system and all the employees of the companies whose turnover with the state exceeds 10% of the total turnover submit statements of wealth and interests” – supported a network user.

“Hey CCR, do something revolting, the world has started to speak of progressive tax, we need something to occupy the public speech. If you can. MS”, someone else supported.

“If they want private life then they will not hold public functions.”someone else replied.

“And they have the feeling to discuss the increase of taxes/taxes”

“We do” scandal “on online for a few days/weeks and it remains that they. Romania, a country that protects the criminals – someone else commented.

“In vain do you have ND and Bolojan, all the PSD barons make the law ”.

“I know this, I think it was more correct to be sent to Parliament for changes again. ”

“ND will do nothing, and it was clear that it has nothing to do from the position for which the candidia from the beginning honestly. But the idiots have celebrated as if Romania will be Switzerland now that he is president. Get used to the above Boyz expression.”

“And all these miseries of people have the feeling to discuss the increase of taxes/taxes or even progressive tax. Characters of jegs ”.