For a moment “T0” in the struggle for the prevention and combating of anti -Semitism, legionaryism and instigating discourse
I am addressing, in particular, to all the ethical authorities with attributions in the field, but also to all the people of good faith in this country. It is not a message of reproach, imputation, accusation. It is a message that calls for sincerity, honesty, (self) analysis to (car) observation, introspection.
Lawjure.com
On these coordinates, the ethical organs that have attributions and act in the fields here in question must recognize their errors, negligences, guilt, lack of more noticeable results, inefficiency on certain levels and so on. responsibility and verticality).
We need, however, that both at the institutional level and the human factor (as civil servants/employees), to be aware of the above, to recognize and assume, and from now on (drawing a symbolic line, setting a “t0” moment or anyway you want to tell them) Make all the positive steps needed for much greater efficiency and professionalization in these fields.
I do not want to talk here only about anti -Semitism, but anti -Semitism, being the oldest hatred, form of discrimination and racism (according to Dani Dayan's wise words): “If you see [antisemitism] act immediately. Don't wait. If you wait, [antisemitismul] it will oversize to monstrous proportions. And then it will be impossible to stop. ”
Replace in the quote above the term anti -Semitism, which I put in brackets, with any other scourge, as a good legionaryism, the apology of war criminals, extremism, women's violence or domestic violence, discrimination against people with disabilities, xenophobia, homophobia -homophobia – And the message is still preserved, and the impetus to action is as alive and necessary.
There is so much extremism, radicalization, violence and hatred in our society including because the ethical authorities did not take on time and/or do not take the most efficient/adequate measures that were required.
But let's not show only to the authorities, but to look at ourselves at the same time. Someone said you can get a man out of misery, but you can't get the mess out of the man. It is a struggle with ourselves (which we should wear) to always progress, become more educated, more moral, more integral, more empathetic, more conciliatory.
And what we need to understand and accept (because there are no other practical/concrete alternatives) is that when the resort to reason failed, when the resort to consciousness also failed, then Last ratio Only the forceful force of the law remains. Anyone manifest, for example, by an anti -Semitic act, anyone publicly promotes fascist, legionary, racist or xenophobic conceptions or doctrines, anyone who apologists of a war criminal like Ion Antonescu will have to bear the rigors of the law – in the sense of being sanctioned/punished according to the legal provisions in force.
Actually it can no longer be continued in the rhythm and in the way so far. State authorities must act with infinitely more operability, professionalism, responsibility and awareness of the severity of the phenomena in the discussion. In fact, let's ask ourselves simply: what decent, common sense and good faith may want to live in a state dominated/suffocated Of extremism, anti -Semitism, legionaryism, chauvinism, racism, discrimination, bigotism or any kind of violence?
We hope that in a reasonable time we will not talk at the present time of the following anomalies (immediately declined-in a short list) for which the Romanian state bears the greatest responsibility. Thus:
– is inadmissible (legal and moral) that for years to allow the existence/operation of a site like incorrectpolitic (by an anti -Semitism taken at the pathological level and which publicly promote fascist, legionary, racist, xenophobic, homophobic conceptions or doctrines, as well as the apology of the person/regime of Ion Antonescu).
– is inadmissible (legal and moral) that for years to allow existence/operation Radio Camarad [un radio legionar, care nu se sfiește să transmistă și expună (inclusiv pe propriul site) simboluri și mesaje legionare interzise prin lege].
– is inadmissible (legal and moral) that for years to allow the existence/operation of the web page Ion Coja (A fierce anti -Semitic and a Holocaust Negationist, a page that people with similar visions disseminate their hatred and ideal poisons).
– is inadmissible (legal and moral) as the first conviction criminaldefinitive in Romanian justice, for Holocaust denial to be done more than 20 years after entering into force of GEO no. 31 of March 13, 2002 (that is, the normative act that incriminates as a crime precisely such facts).
– is inadmissible (legal and moral) as the punishment for this first conviction for the denial of the Holocaust (the deed being committed in the form of a book and two articles) to consist of a simple warning applied to the advice, none other than the visceral anti -Semite Vasile Zărnescu;
– is inadmissible (legal and moral) that for years to allow the existence/operation of a site/Art-Emis magazinesin which, among other things, Vasile Zărnescu will continue to publish (and after conviction) articles of extreme anti -Semitism;
– It is inadmissible (legal and moral) to allow the broadcast of some shows of the invoice “Romanian heart ” (to Apollonia TV) in which a ferocious anti -Semitic and a non -Gyssist of the Romanian Holocaust like Gică Manole to poison through its anti -Semitic diatibly and by distorting the historical truth of public opinion;
– It is inadmissible As a territorial administrative unit in Romania (with the contest/complicity of the Prefect Institution – Botoșani County and the Government of Romania) to issue an administrative act by which to give the name “Prof. Dr. Gică Manole”under the motivation that: “He dedicated his entire life to finding and transmitting the historical truth so many generations of students, but also to those who love history, being an emblematic personality of Romania with whom we pride ourselves.” (Chic!); Recall we are talking about the same notorious anti -Semitic Gică Manole, who inter alia He raised a bust of Marshal Ion Antonescu in his own yard or who speaks of a criminal of Corneliu Zelea Codreanu's invoice in terms of “holy”, even considering that he should “canonized”.
– It is inadmissible (legal and moral), and this I found including from the personal correspondence carried with this institution, that the CNCD is so much behind with the settlement of the files and the pronouncement of the decisions, so that in September 2024 it will deliberate in relation to the files registered for 2022.
– is inadmissible (legal and moral) as a clear criminal files (formulated on the basis of GEO no. 31/2002, of Law no. 157/2018 and/or of art. 369 C. pen. to train for years in the role of prosecutor's office, so that the facts will be prescribed or issued clearly illegal solutions;
– is inadmissible (legal and moral) as individuals with multiple files, Reminding here Diana Iovanovici Şoșoaca, George Simion or even Gică Manole to benefit from the indolence or complicity of the authorities, practically encouraging them to continue and even persevere in violation of the law.
– is inadmissible (legal and moral) as individuals like Calin Georgescufor years, to have the freedom to do in the public space the apology of Corneliu Zelea Codreanu and Ion Antonescu, to take and transmit publicly (sometimes even literally) discourses, conceptions and ideologies of the two antennialized (ie fascist-leging) criminals or to coagulate around them/their associations and (neo) legionary movements, extremist parties and other entities (local & foreign), which follow the destabilization of democracy and constitutional order.
This material is responsible exclusively the author
