Featured

Romgaz explanations regarding the demand for dissolution of Greenpeace, NGO that opposes the Neptun Deep project

Romgaz explained why he decided to formulate, through his subsidiary involved in the Neptun Deep project, a request to sue, with the object of dissolving the Greenpeace CEE (Central Eastern Europe) Romania.

Greenpeace activists have often protested against the Neptun Deep project

Greenpeace activists have often protested against the Neptun Deep project

According to Romgaz, the Greenpeace CEE Foundation (Central Eastern Europe) Romania is insolvent and used as a screen of another legal entity with the same name, to circumvent any form of patrimonial liability provided by law.

“Romgaz made the decision to request in court the dissolution of the Greenpeace CEE Foundation (Central Eastern Europe) Romania, applicant in the files regarding Neptun Deep project, After the procedural steps were completed and the necessary prior analyzes were performed.

The summons regarding the payment of the costs, to which the Greenpeace CEE Foundation (Central Eastern Europe) Romania – CIF 37026417 was obliged by definitive sentence no. (Central Eastern Europe) Romania, CIF 37026417, is the lack of any assets, movable or immovable property, money availability, as well as the non -existence of any account opened at banking or treasury units. In other words, this foundation is insolvent ”,
Romgaz announces.

Romgaz found, following the consultation of the official website of Greenpeace Romania, that there is another entity with the same name, but CIF different (IE, CIF 22747989), says the company.

“Moreover, I found that the donations requested to the public to finance the Greenpeace activity are collected by Greenpeace CEE (Central Eastern Europe) Romania, CIF 22747989 The two entities are included in distinctly including on the website of the Ministry of Public Finance, none of the two cures not inactive/radiated. Between them for the public and the authorities. caused ”,
the state company states.

According to the legal provisions, in case a foundation becomes insolvent or when it follows a purpose other than the one for which it was constituted, its dissolution is ascertained by a court decision.

Thus, Romgaz asked the court to analyze whether the legal reasons for the dissolution of Greenpeace CEE (Central Eastern Europe), CIF 37026417 are met.

Romgaz trusts that the court will correctly analyze the request against Greenpeace CEE (Central Eastern Europe) Romania, CIF 37026417 and ensures that it will comply with the court's decision. Romgaz believes that Greenpeace has the right to introduce actions in court, but also the obligation to comply with the legal provisions, as Greenpeace should recognize Romgaz law to introduce an action in court. Romgaz reiterates that the Neptun Deep project respects the applicable legal provisions, and this project is one that will ensure the energy security of Romania”, Romgaz announced.

The company claims that the Minister of Energy, Sebastian Burduja, was not involved and did not decide to introduce the action of Romgaz against Greenpeace CEE (Central Eastern Europe), but was only informed after the action.

As a reply at the request addressed by Romgaz to the court, Greenpeace accuses that the approach was taken at the request of the Minister of Energy, Sebastian Burduja, and requests his resignation. Greenpeace asked in court to block the Neptun Deep project, to exploit natural gas in the Black Sea.

Ashley Davis

I’m Ashley Davis as an editor, I’m committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity and accuracy in every piece we publish. My work is driven by curiosity, a passion for truth, and a belief that journalism plays a crucial role in shaping public discourse. I strive to tell stories that not only inform but also inspire action and conversation.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button