Other

In Igarka, the director of the technical school for three years selected bonuses from employees


May 26 14:56

In Igar, a criminal case was opened against the director of a multidisciplinary college for monetary fraud. This was told in the prosecutor's office of the Krasnoyarsk Territory.

In 2020, the regional service of financial and economic control in the field of procurement conducted an audit in the KGBPOU “Igarsky multidisciplinary college” and revealed gross violations of bunching and ordering regional money.

It turned out that the leadership organized inconsistent business trips, and credited teachers as students on a budget department. This helped the technical school get subsidies for a large number of students. The institution was obliged to return more than 4 million to the budget of the Krasnoyarsk Territory.

By December 2021, the debt was repaid. The technical school allegedly earned money at the expense of his own activities: the sale of bakery products and training in driving the local population.

The prosecutor's office conducted a check. It turned out that the director of the technical school collected money collected money not only from entrepreneurship, but also at the expense of the budget. In addition, after the execution of the order, she continued the fraud.

So, from 2021 to 2024, the leader accrued employees with increased bonuses. She subsequently took part of the money in cash and returned back to the budget. So the director received at least 200 thousand rubles. Employees of the technical school told about the fraud. The prosecutor’s office clarified that other circumstances will be clarified during the investigation. In relation to women, they opened a criminal case of abuse of authority (paragraph “E” of part 3 of article 286 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation).

After the leader received a prosecutor’s request, she decided to destroy accounting documentation. For this, the woman created a commission. However, employees of accounting refused to execute instructions.

The suspect was detained for 2 months. The prosecutor insisted on this, because the woman had already tried to destroy the documents, which means that she can affect the collection of evidence and witnesses.

The woman pleaded guilty and stated that she plans to compensate for the damage, but refused explanations. The criminal investigation is under control.