What a punishment Ionel Ganea picks up, according to the drama he produced in his own family. His baby is still in a coma
A week ago, Ionel Ganea caused a serious traffic accident, entering the car in an irregularly stationary car on the edge of the road. His two -year -old child, with whom he was going to a monastery, was designed on the vehicle, suffering major cranial trauma. Alexandru is in an induced coma, at the hospital in Târgu Mureș, where he was operated twice. The former footballer, 51 years old, has not left the hospital unit where the boy is admitted.
Ionel Ganea, desperate to save his child. Photo Mediafax/ Leczki Jozsi
Lawyer Adrian Cuculis commented on the case and revealed the first information about the punishment of Ionel Ganea, considering that the accident he challenged resulted in victims. He claimed that the former international would have used the mobile phone, because otherwise it is not explained why it entered the car stopped. This fact would be a circumstance that can be aggravating in establishing the punishment.
“The child was held without a belt and in the front seat, and I understand that he would also use his mobile phone. I consider, as a parent, not a lawyer, that things are clear. You entered a stationed car, you have injured your child, it is clear that you did not want to do this,
Criminal fine for injury by guilt
Because there is no question that we have to put people in prison that they have committed the respective facts. We must see the way in which that deed was performed. If he can be guilty in the way he wanted to do that thing … Although I think there are zero chances, it was simply an unfortunate event.
Body injury, because we talk about it, is punishable including with a criminal fine. Let's hope the crime will remain here. Understand what I mean ”said Adrian Cuculis, according to Kanal D.
Would have used your mobile phone
“If it happens, God forbid!, That this child will not escape, will be called guilty killing, classified from 2 to 7 years, because some traffic rules were violated, including the use of the mobile phone. I understood it, that it would be a phone, because there is no other explanation for a collision.
We know how much we know from the limit of the investigation, no other information appeared. It is possible that when establishing the fault, following the dynamics of the accident and the hearing of the persons involved to be noted that that driver also had his fault. Or maybe he was going to go there. The speed must also be determined.
Ionel Ganea has the main blame
Many years ago, the High Court established that you, as a participant in traffic, even if someone enters you and you have no guilt, you can still be guilty or the other's fault regarding the extent of damage and damage. If the child was sitting back with the belt (no special chair is needed), it happened now? So, Ganea has his fault that he was not respected about his own traffic participation.
May not be found guilty of bodily injury or other crime, if something happens, because we do not know the dynamics of the accident, we do not know How did that man parked his car there. All these things must be absolutely objective to the prosecutor and experts who make measurements and see if the parked car was neither parallel nor perpendicular, was in a caldarm, with the back to the road or even on the road. “said lawyer Adrian Cuculis.
