2025-05-14 16:24
publication
2025-05-14 16:24
India authorities questioned the course of events presented by the US administration, which led to the suspension of weapons with Pakistan. According to President Donald Trump, his mediation led to stopping the armed conflict between countries that have nuclear weapons.
The New York Times published on Wednesday that the spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of India Randhir Jaiswal questioned that during the negotiations preceding the suspension of weapons with Pakistan, economic issues were raised at all. Trump, who was the first to inform about the negotiated agreement on Saturday, later explained that the promise of increasing trade from the US was one of the incentives he used in negotiations with governments in Islamabad and Delhi.
According to the American side, Trump was also to threaten the suspension of trade if India and Pakistan did not reach an agreement. “There were talks between the leaders of India and the USA about the developing military situation. The issue of trade did not appear in any of these discussions,” said Jaiswal, who quotes “NYT”.
India is sorry for Trump
In the opinion of experts, on which the American newspaper cited, the Delhi government is disappointed in the way the US president is negotiated. First of all, Indian politicians are bad for him that he equated the arguments of both countries and did not indicate Pakistan as a country responsible for the attack in Pahalgam of April 22, which caused the current increase in the tension and action of the armed forces.
In the opinions of analysts, which “NYT” talked to, some of the Indian government elites may be afraid of “succumbing to external pressure and stopping the right confrontation from winning the victory over a weaker opponent.” According to Gazeta, India depended on rapprochement with the USA, among others To balance the Pakistan alliance with China. “NYT” wrote that the authorities in Delhi “were too optimistic to expect unambiguous support from Washington and a full American divorce with Pakistan.”
“The US and China can be strategic rivals everywhere, but they meet in Pakistan. This reality has not changed,” she said, cited by “NYT”, an Indian foreign policy expert in Indrani Bagchi.
The current Indian-Pakistani armed conflict began on May 7, when India conducted a series of attacks for purposes in Pakistan. According to Delhi, it was retaliation for the terrorist attack in Pahalgam, in Indian cashmere, in which 26 people were killed. Pakistan categorically rejected the accusations of relationships with this attack. In response to the Indian Pakistani troops, they conducted a series of strokes for purposes in India. The tension in relations between the two countries that have nuclear weapons caused a serious anxiety of the international community.
The dispute over the status of cashmere remains unresolved from the division of British India and the creation of independent India and Pakistan in 1947. (PAP)
Piu/ AP/
