Article by Daniel Grigore – published on Friday, 02 May 2025 21:53 / Updated Friday, 02 May 2025 23:04
Adrian Iencsi, 50 years old, former player and coach at Rapidbelieves that Giulesti should have received penalty at the 23rd minute phase of the match with the University of Craiovaat the score of 0-0, when Carlos Mora was hit in his own square on Claudiu Petrila.
In the middle of the first half of Bănie, Claudiu Petrila was the author of an incursion into the left band. The rapist extreme entered the opponent's box and avoided Carlos Mora with a slit to the outside, when the two made contact at the level of the left legs.
Petrila fell immediately and accused the blow, but the “central” Marian Barbu, well positioned, did not whistle. Even the “Var” Cătălin Popa did not warn that it would be necessary to give a kick from 11 meters, although the blow was clear.
However, it was not a “full” contact and did not seem to have great intensity, but Adrian Iencsi, former defender and coach at Rapid, believes that the referee had to dictate a penalty at that phase.
Adrian Iencsi believes that Rapid had to receive a penalty in Bania: “a defendant's negligence”
“From my point of view, a penalty could be granted, even if that touch did not have very high intensity. It was a pinch there, it's the defender's negligence. At such times you have to be very careful, to tattoo, especially when you face a player like Petrila.
You have to sit very well on your feet, with your feet flexed and not give you the opportunity to dribble, and when it makes the passage by you try to avoid contact. From my point of view, and as a defender, a penalty could be granted.
It's a correct analysis from my point of view, it's my thinking. Probably the referee thought that the intensity was not very high, ”Iencsi said at the GSP Live Special.
An arbitration specialist contacted by GSP.ro had the same opinion: “attack with the sole directly on the opponent's foot. Not by chance.”
The first half did not have a very high rhythm. Better start of Craiova and a plus as a whole for Craiova, which seems to have the control of the game. But there were not many occasions.
– Adrian Iencsi
