Florin Tanase counterattaca, in the scandal at Rapid

He is aware of the importance of today's triumph, claims that the first half belonged to FCSB, not exposing his decrease from the second.

He makes his “fault” for the mistake in the phase that led to Christensen's goal, opening the subject arbitration. The Giulesti demands a foul of Târnovanu on Christensen, unverified from the Var of Radu Petrescu cabin. “Tase” recalls that Petrila should have been eliminated.

Florin Tănase: “You have not seen in Craiova? Butter what they did and they also said they were stolen!”

“A very important victory against a very good opponent. It's not easy to win here. We made a very good first half, it belonged to us. In the second it was the opposite, they controlled the game.

I do not know why, but … I dropped a little after the first void, it was my mistake, but it is inexplicable how weak I played in the second half. I don't know what mistakes incriminates Rapid. Penalty there? It was a clear red at Petrila, indisputable. They all got used to being stolen so many years.

Have you not seen in Craiova? Slaughter what they did and went out and they also said they were stolen! Lord! I took a big step towards the title, but the second half must give us a thought. We have to analyze, because we can't play that way. I had days off, you can't say it's tired, “Tanase told Flash-interview for Digisport.

After a series of nine consecutive parties without failure in front of the counseling, Rapid lost today in front of FCSB, score 1-2, and the red-blue broke off at six points of followers, while the white-troop has a very difficult mission to hope for a premiers.

Cisotti quickly opened the score for Elias Charalambous, and, against the background of a modest game, Bîrligea doubled the advantage of the champion in Superliga. Christensen reduced the advantage in the beginning of the second repuries, but the match ended with Victoria

What does the ranking in the Superligi Play-off look like: