On the video from a height (apparently removed from a satellite or drone), it is clear how a blow is delivered on an open area. When the smoke dissipates, there remains a funnel from the explosion.
“These Husites gathered to receive instructions for the attack. OPS, there will be no attacks from these Husites! They will never stop our ships again,” Trump wrote.
These Houths Gathered for Instructions on an Attack. OOPS, there will be no attack by these Houthis!
They Will Never Sink Oour SHIPS AGAIN! pic.twitter.com/lezfydgwp5
– Donald J. Trump (@realdonaldtrump) April 4, 2025
In the comments under his post, some users expressed doubt that the blow was inflicted on the militants.
In particular, the military journalist Ahmad Slman wrote that Yemen's tribes could gather for a holiday.
Context
Trump's publication appeared against the backdrop of a scandal with a discussion of husytes by American civil servants.
On March 24, the editor of The Atlantic Jeffrey Goldberg said that his An erroneously added to the chat in the Signal messenger, in which Trump representatives discussed the planned American Blows on the Yemeni Husites. According to Goldberg, he received a request to join the Signal messenger on March 11 from a user named Mike Waltz (this is Trump adviser to national security).
Two days later, on March 13, according to Goldberg, he received a message about the invitation to join the Houth PC Small Group. In it, in particular, the accounts identified as US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, signed as Mar, US Vice-President Jay Di Di Gabbard, US-Minister of Finance, US Secretary of Defense, US Secretary of Defense, a total of 18 people, was 18 people.
Politico It wrote that the members of the Congress and National Security Employees expressed indignation and surprise of the material of The Atlantic. The media reports that the incident was convicted by the congressmen not only of the democratic, but also of the Republican Party. Some democrats have already called for an investigation and consider the possible consequences for officials involved in this incident, reports Axios.
On March 25, Hegset said in a commentary Fox News, which was published in X, that “no one corresponded about military plans” after it became known that the editor -in -chief of The Atlantic gained access to the Signal group chat. He called the editor “false” and “discredited by the so -called journalist”, referring to the previous critical reports of the publication about Trump.
On the same day, Politico wrote that Trump can fire Waltz Due to the leakage of data on the attacks on Yemen, but the White House in a written comment, The Hill said that the US President has no questions for the national security adviser and other top security units after a scandal with a chat in Signal.
In the evening of March 25 Waltz took on “full responsibility” for the incident, What did Fox News say about in an interview with.
