The explosion occurred during a test firing of the engines of the New Glenn rocket, just a few days before the planned launch. This accident could also impact NASA's plans for lunar missions, further complicating Blue Origin's situation.
during Thursday's incident, according to sources close to the company the booster called “No, It's Necessary” was completely destroyeda the starting point was seriously damaged. Engineers predict that infrastructure repairs will take at least six months and possibly even longer. A person familiar with the matter, who did not want to reveal his identity, emphasized that the break in activities may last much longer than originally expected.
Falcon 9 rocket explosion on the SpaceX launch pad in 2016 showed how long-lasting the effects of such incidents can be. At that time, it took over a year to repair the infrastructure, although launches resumed after just four and a half months, with operations being moved to another site in Florida. In Blue Origin's case, recovery could take just as long or even longer.
Antoine Grenier of consulting firm Analysys Mason noted that although similar accidents have occurred before, rebuilding the launch site always requires many months of work. He also added that Amazon's decision to work with more partners, including SpaceX, has reduced its dependence on a single rocket, but at the same time gives Musk an advantage over Bezos.
Read also: Elon Musk and SpaceX in investors' crosshairs. Record offer already in June
Impact on Amazon and NASA plans
Amazon planned to use the rapid pace of New Glenn launches to put half of its constellation of more than 3,200 broadband internet satellites into orbit by July 2026. A longer break in flights due to a decision by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) may seriously jeopardize the implementation of these plans and make it difficult to meet regulatory deadlines.
Grenier emphasized that Amazon has already used most of the soon-to-be available launch opportunities offered by other large rocket operators. He pointed out that although SpaceX could absorb some of the additional demand, Falcon 9 can only put half as much into orbit as New Glenn. This means that diverting more launches would require a significant increase in the number of missions.
Additionally, Payloads intended for lunar missions are designed for specific rocketswhich makes switching carriers very complicated. A New Glenn rocket was scheduled to launch Blue Origin's first lunar lander, Blue Moon, later this year. Days before the incident, NASA awarded the company a contract to deliver two lunar rovers ahead of the Artemis 4 mission, scheduled for 2028.
NASA said it will analyze the impact of the incident on its Artemis and Moon Base programs, but it is not yet known whether any of the flights will have to be diverted.
See also: Amazon acquires Globalstar. He wants to challenge Elon Musk's SpaceX
Industry reactions and market consequences
It is still unclear how serious the long-term effects of this incident will be on Blue Origin and whether SpaceX, which already has a full backlog of orders for its own Starlink satellites and commercial and government missions, will benefit from the situation. The U.S. Space Force and National Reconnaissance Office reaffirmed their support for Blue Origin on Fridaymaintaining a newly awarded national security launch contract despite the catastrophic explosion of the New Glenn rocket.
Mark Boggett, director of the British investment fund Seraphim Space, said that in the long term the market needs real alternatives anyway, so the current situation only slightly strengthens SpaceX's position, but does not change the general trend towards a multi-supplier ecosystem.
On social media, Elon Musk expressed hope that Blue Origin would quickly deal with the consequences of the accident, and also addressed Jeff Bezos with the Latin phrase “Ad astra per aspera”, emphasizing that achieving ambitious goals requires overcoming difficulties.
