Many parents expect that the time and money invested in raising children will pay off later with full attention and availability. Psychologists warn that this turns the young adult's independence into a source of guilt and directly affects his future relationships as a couple.
Photo source: Pixabay
A recent viral Instagram page post The Kind Party sparked heated debate online after touching on a sensitive point in modern parenting: the child's emotional debt to the parent.
“The child comes, slowly and without an explicit contract, to be treated not only as a son or daughter, but as a proof of success, a center of meaning, an obligatory company and a guarantee that the life of the adult who raised him was not in vain. (…) There is an essential difference between recognizing the effort of a parent and surrendering your life as a form of emotional repayment”. representatives note Kind Party.
They point out that the drama begins when the parent has no inner life of his own – friends, curiosities, passions – and makes the child the center of his universe. Thus, the autonomy and independence of the adult child is misread as abandonment, offense or cruelty.
“The child can love, he can help, he can call, he can come, he can be present. But he cannot be forced to become a cure for the adult's loneliness, restlessness or meaninglessness. (…) The child is not a tenant in the life of the parent. He is not obliged to pay monthly in attention, blame and availability”.
The “affective repayment” trap
Starting from this debate, Gabriela Marc, senior clinical psychologist and associate university lecturer at the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, explained to “The Truth” the mechanisms by which this dynamic affects the emotional development of children.
“There is a sentence that is almost never said in the family, but it is felt in many relationships: “after everything I have done for you”. It does not appear as a direct demand, it is not explicitly formulated, but it creates a space in which the child begins to feel that his love must compensate for something.” declares Gabriela Marc.
According to the specialist, the difference between gratitude and “affective repayment” it is huge. If gratitude is free and approachable, repayment turns the relationship into an invisible transaction: the child feels he must give something back in order to remain loved.
Emotional poverty and money: How trauma affects income. “Romanians prefer to leave than to negotiate; you have to believe you deserve more”
This burden does not appear in adulthood, but is installed early, in the moments when the child feels the need to be attentive to the state of the parent, not to upset him and to hold him “in balance”. “There is no explicit requirement, but there is an atmosphere where the child learns that love comes with the responsibility to take care of the other,” adds the psychologist.
How emotional debt sabotages our married life
When a child lives with the feeling that his independence will hurt the parent, a severe loyalty conflict forms. Autonomy is felt as betrayal, and separation as abandonment. “Any personal choice activates a deep tension: if I choose me, I lose the relationship,” psychologist Gabriela Marc points out.
This behavior inevitably carries over into adulthood and dictates how that child, as an adult, will choose their partner. Many end up looking in a couple not just for love, but for regulation, security and unconditional validation.
“The partner becomes a figure who is supposed to fill an older void. Expectations rise, emotional dependence intensifies, and the relationship ends up being charged with a need that is not entirely his own. In other situations, avoidance occurs. The fear of not becoming responsible for someone else's emotions again leads to distance, withdrawal, difficulty in getting deeply involved.” explains Gabriela Marc.
That's how adults who can't speak end up in psychotherapy offices “not” without guilt, who live in constant bodily tension and who feel that they must be constantly available in order not to disappoint.
Mourning the separation from the role of parent
From the parent's perspective, the process is just as complex. For many, the role of parent has provided direction and identity for years. When the child separates, the parent experiences a feeling of emptiness. “If that void is not recognized, it turns into expectation. Therefore, the child's independence is read as abandonment. His limits are perceived as rejection”says the psychologist.
The solution lies not in guilt, but in the reconstruction of adult identity beyond the role of mother or father. “It is a process of mourning, of breaking away from the role, of rediscovery. It is the moment when the meaning no longer comes from the child, it comes from one's own life”. adds the specialist.
“In a culture where closeness is often confused with sacrifice, it becomes essential to normalize the idea that a busy, different, or autonomous child is not ungrateful. He is an adult building his own life. He does not need to be the emotional support of the adult, he does not need to fix, he does not need to fill voids that do not belong to him.” concludes Gabriela Marc.
