GSP grades from 2 to 8 in U Cluj

Although they controlled the game even with a man down, Coelho's students scored on almost every counterattack.

Here's how the players scored:

Cluj's scores in the match with CSU Craiova:

• Gertmonas (note 7) – Sure on him, he had several interventions in the actions of the Olten people

• Mikanovic (grade 6) – Helped his team in the defensive compartment and caused Etim's elimination

• I. Cristea (grade 7) – Great chance in the first half and saved a goal from Teles' execution

• Coubiș (note 7) – Solid on the bottom line, with most of CSU's chances coming from long shots

• Chipciu (note 6) – Helped his team in the defensive department

• Ov. Bic (grade 7) – Active throughout the game, found his teammates well in attack and set pieces

• Drammeh (note 5) – Without special achievements, absent in the center line, Craiova totally controlled the area

• Mendy (grade 5) – Quite absent, the balls didn't really look for him during the game

• Stanojev (note 8) – Best on the field in the first half: opened the scoring and passed decisively to Lukic for the second goal

• Lukic (grade 8) – Decisively, he made “U” break away: two chances, two goals

• El Sawy (note 7) – Very active in the first half on the flank, he passed decisively for the 1-0 goal

• Cristiano Bergodi (coach, grade 8) – He stuck to the tactical plan even after the game was destabilized in the first quarter of an hour. The “Red Caps” succeeded in almost every counterattack.

Along the way they also entered:

• Macalou (64', score 7) – He had two opportunities and decisively passed to Nistor on the fourth success

• Trica (72', score 5) – He didn't have the opportunity to prove much – the ball didn't really look for him in the last quarter of an hour

• Silva (72', score 5) – Neither stood out nor made a mistake

• Codrea (81') – He played too little to be rated

• Nistor (81') – He played too little to be rated

Olten's scores in the match with U Cluj

• Popescu (grade 4) – He scored on almost every opportunity of the “U” team, but he did not make a mistake in any of the phases

• Romachuk (grade 4) – Surpassed when he was most needed, in the note of his defensive colleagues

• Russian (grade 4) – Positioning mistakes that mattered decisively in the economy of the result

• Screech (note 5) – He blocked several attempts to break away from the opponents, but he was not helped by his teammates

• Mora (note 6) – Extremely active and involved in prolonged guest possession

• Cicada (note 6) – Much below the usual level, several missed executions, but he constantly participated in the pressure put by Olteni

• Teles (note 6) – Active in possession too, energetic, lots of clearances and a big chance in the second half

• Fl. Ștefan (note 6) – Consistent play, presence of mind on several occasions and had an execution that could restart the game at 2-0 –

• D. Matei (note 5) – Below the average of his colleagues, who searched for him several times. He failed to penetrate the Transylvanian defense

• Assad (note 4) – It didn't stand out. Colleagues did not really look for him, also forced by the evolution of the game and the elimination of Etim

• Etim (note 2) – Violent entry without any sense in the first quarter of an hour, which cost Craiova dearly

• Filipe Coelho (coach, grade 7). Despite the score difference, his students controlled and even dominated the game in some places, even if they played with one less man for almost the whole game)

They also entered along the way:

• Bairam (58', score 5) – He stood out well on several occasions, managing to tick off two half chances

• Nsimba (58',note 4) – Introduced to make a difference, it was almost non-existent

• Basceanu (58',note 5) – In Matei's note, with a little more initiative

• Cretu (79') – He played too little to be rated

• Badelj (83') – He played too little to be rated