

The names were not indicated in the court decision, but earlier on the website “Judicial Power of Ukraine” The divorce case was publishedinitiated by Taras Topolya. It was registered on December 3 under No. 758/19398/25. The case number coincides with the court decision number.
It emphasizes that the plaintiff expressed a desire to dissolve his marriage with Elena Topolya, among other things, because they had different views on life and family, as well as separate budgets.
At the time of the divorce decision, the spouses lacked common interests and mutual understanding.
“The court came to the conclusion that the family has actually broken up, there is no joint household, reconciliation between the parties is impossible, the parties did not insist on this, and further living together and preserving the marriage will be contrary to the interests of the parties,” the decision says.
Context
Elena and Taras Topoli got married in 2013. They had three children in their marriage. The fact that they decided to divorce, the spouses announced December 1, 2025. The couple did not give reasons for the separation then. Amid the divorce, Taras and Elena unfollowed each other on Instagram. Previously, the couple repeatedly during the interview talked about problems in marriage.
During the dayOn January 19, 2025, Taras Topolya reported that the court officially dissolved their marriage back on January 14th. His statement came amid a scandal that erupted earlier that day after many Ukrainian Telegram channels reported that they were sent an intimate video with the participation of Elena Topoli. Poplar herself said that On January 10, they began to blackmail her with intimate videos and demanded money.
On the afternoon of January 19, law enforcement officers reported the detention of a 23-year-old Kiev resident, who is suspected of blackmailing the artist. The police said that the suspect knew the singer, gained her trust and produced incriminating materials.
Ukrainian presenter Evgeniy Feshak admitted on January 24 that he was one of those who was sent this video. He stated that “I looked at a couple of frames.” Feshak also added that the man who was captured with the artist in the video seemed familiar to him.
Taras Topolya, in turn, said that he was also sent a video with her participation, after which he contacted the police.
“The video contains a detailed, naturalistic demonstration of genitals and sexual intercourse, which is aimed solely at arousing the viewer’s sexual desire, which gives grounds to qualify this content as containing signs of pornography,” Topol wrote in a statement.




