Can we heal ourselves through the power of thoughts? Psychologist: “The human body does not work on the basis of a single variable”

The idea that we can heal ourselves completely through the power of thoughts alone is appealing to more and more people. But experts explain that while thoughts can have real effects on the body, they cannot guarantee instant cures or results.

Photo source: Pixabay

Joe Dispenza recounts how his fragmented lifestyle threw his body out of balance: his conferences overlapped his sleep hours, his time zones were constantly changing, and his usual melatonin and tricks stopped working. “I'd land and take off straight away, with no time to adjust,” he says.

How much our thoughts can influence our body

The recovery of the body after the effort, he confesses, began to slow down noticeably: “I was asking a lot of my body.” Instead of making incremental adjustments, he opted for a full medical evaluation: “I wanted to see everything.” After receiving the results, for three months, he practiced guided meditation techniques daily as the only method of intervention to heal his body. The result, according to subsequent analyses, was one that surprised even the medical team. “Your testosterone level is higher than a teenager's right now,” the doctors told him.

He emphasizes, moreover, that his diet has remained unchanged. According to his statements, the changes did not come from the outside, but from the way the information was transmitted to the body.

Meditation and Intention: Tools for Regulating the Body

Dispenza claims that meditation and positive thoughts can influence the way the body works. If stress can trigger certain reactions and alter gene expression, thoughts and intention can have opposite effects, regulating these processes. Basically, they can change body chemistry and hormone levels, and some proteins (neuropeptides) could stimulate growth hormone production or adjust serotonin levels.

Although Dispenza talks about the power of thoughts over the body, psychologists point out that the effects are not guaranteed and must be interpreted with discernment: the mind can influence the body, but it cannot completely control it.

What the specialists say

For example, in the opinion of Gabriela Marc, lead clinical psychologist and associate university lecturer at the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, all these messages that talk about the power of thought, intention, regeneration and inner healing touch a deeply human need: the desire for meaning and control when the body or life goes out of control.

“In a culture marked by chronic stress, unnamed trauma, and the pressure to 'function,' speeches like Joe Dispenza's offer hope, direction, and accessible language about change.” For many people, they bridge science, spirituality, and personal experience. Here, however, there is an area that requires finesse and nuance. There is a real connection between mind and body. At the same time, there is an essential difference between saying that the mind influences the body and suggesting that it can completely control it or produce guaranteed changes. The first statement is supported by psychology and neuroscience. The second, lacking a framework of safety and discernment, risks turning human complexity into a simplified promise,” she explained.

Expert studies clearly support that emotions, stress and how we interpret danger influence the functioning of the autonomic nervous system and the stress axis, she adds: “Prolonged stress can alter hormone secretion, inflammation, sleep, immunity, and ability to regulate emotions. From this point of view, the statement that the mind influences the body is solidly founded. Practices that reduce stress and increase the ability to regulate, meditation, breathing, mindfulness, body awareness can have measurable effects on physiological and psychological state. They can support recovery processes, reduce symptoms and improve quality of life”.

The Limits of Mind Power: Reality vs. myth

What remains speculative, however, is the idea of ​​a direct, linear and universally valid control. “The human body does not operate on a single variable. It is simultaneously influenced by biology, personal history, trauma, relationships, environment, lifestyle and medical interventions. To reduce healing to just one sure thing, the power of thought, is to ignore this complex network.” warns the specialist.

The idea that the heart “informs” the brain comes up frequently in mind-body discourse, she says. Clinically translated, this means that there is a two-way communication between the body and the brain, mediated by the autonomic nervous system. “The body is constantly sending signals about safety or danger, and the brain integrates them. The difficulty comes when this metaphor is taken literally. Trauma is not a faulty memory that can be erased by an intense emotional state. It is a learned physiological response, stored in the body and in the relationship. Coming back to self takes time, dosage, safety and integration, not an instant reset by intention.” is the opinion of Gabriela Marc.

One of the most subtle effects of these messages is the risk of self-blame, she points out: “When the idea that you “create your reality” is taken to the extreme it can implicitly suggest that the illness is a personal failure, evidence that you are not thinking or feeling “correctly”, that it is your fault or that you are broken. For people already grieving, this message can add shame to pain.”

According to him, a mature psychological perspective makes a clear distinction: the mind can influence the body, but illness is not to blame. Influence does not equate to full moral responsibility. Body suffering is not evidence of insufficient consciousness.

The role of relationships and experiences in healing the body

“There are real cases of significant improvement, sometimes even remission. These can be understood as the result of a combination of factors: stress reduction, behavioral changes, trusting relationship, inner transformation and personal meaning, waiting effects, the natural evolution of the disease or effective medical interventions. To deny them would be a form of rigidity. To turn them into a universal rule is equally problematic.” thinks Gabriela Marc.

Integrative psychology accepts this paradox, she argues, sometimes it happens, sometimes it doesn't. And the value of the process is not only measured in biological results, it is also measured in inner freedom

Beyond the differences of language and school, most contemporary psychological approaches converge on a common point – the therapeutic relationship and the feeling of safety are essential: “The nervous system is not regulated by affirmations, it is regulated by repeated experiences of safe contact, co-regulation and predictability. The human brain organizes itself in relation, through emotional co-regulation, living contact and mutual connection. No form of practice, no matter how sophisticated, can substitute for human relationship without psychological cost. Techniques can support the process, but the relational framework is what enables integration.”

Whether we talk about working with the body, autonomic regulation, meaning, beliefs or transgenerational legacies, all these perspectives touch on a functional truth about humans, adds the psychologist: “Here an essential limit emerges that deserves to be clearly stated and cannot be ignored without consequence: influence is real, total control is an illusion.”

Perhaps one of the subtlest pitfalls of seeking healing is our tendency to go parallel to too many things at once, continues Gabriela Marc: “Practices, theories, people, promises. It's like we're running on several roads at once, hoping that one of them will finally lead us to where it hurts less. We're looking for that fit, that 'something' that will transform us, make us better, or complete us. In the process we transform, adjust, reshape ourselves to what we think works. Curiously, the other often does the same. Each one changes in the direction of what he hopes will be saving for himself and for the other”.

And in the end, the roads no longer coincide: “Not because they were wrong. Not because they had no value. What was lost on the long road to that miraculous something was: individuality. It was forgotten who everyone was before all the adjustments”

Perhaps true transformation does not begin with the desire to become someone else, it begins with slowing down enough to stop abandoning ourselves in the name of miraculous cures, the psychologist admits. “Not with forcing change, with creating a space where body, mind and relationship can stay together. From this place, transformation does not fragment us. It unifies us,” it concludes.