A revolution in publishing. Young researchers massively use AI for reviews

Most reviewers of scientific publications already use artificial intelligence, and publishing policies do not yet take these changes into account. This should be settled as soon as possible, according to a report by Frontiers publishing house.

Its authors argue that tools based on artificial intelligence (AI) have become an element of everyday practice of the review process. Currently, 53% of people admit to using them. reviewers. This technology is spreading so quickly that it has become necessary to introduce rules ensuring transparency, reliability and equality in the system of evaluating scientific publications.

The report is based on the results of a global survey conducted among 1,645 active scientists from around the world. The collected data showed that the community willingly uses AI and wants to do it in a conscious and responsible way. Currently, artificial intelligence most often supports reviewers in editing opinions or summarizing research results. The authors of the report, however, believe that the potential of this technology is much greater, but still untapped.

“Artificial intelligence is already improving the efficiency and transparency of the review process, but its greatest opportunities are yet to come. With appropriate management rules, transparency and training, it can become an important partner in improving the quality of research and trust in scientific achievements,” emphasized Elena Vicario, director of research integrity at Frontiers.

The study shows that scientists at the early stage of their career are most interested in the advanced use of AI – in this group, the percentage of people using it in their work reaches 87%. It is also eagerly used by dynamically developing regions, such as China, where it is used by 77%. researchers and Africa – 66 percent

Respondents around the world indicate that artificial intelligence helps them, among others: reduce workload and improve communication, although at the same time they unanimously emphasize the need for clear and uniform rules for its application.

In response to these expectations, Frontiers presented a set of recommendations addressed to publishers, scientific institutions, research funding agencies and creators of technological tools. They include, among others: an obligation to disclose the use of AI, integrating AI-related competencies into the training system, strengthening standards of supervision and research integrity, improving the ability to trace the origin of data used by AI, and ensuring equal access to reliable tools for all researchers.

“Artificial intelligence is changing the way scientific publications are produced and assessed. Our report is a call to action for the entire research community. With consistent principles and responsible use, AI can strengthen research integrity and accelerate discovery.” – noted Kamila Markram, president and co-founder of Frontiers.

Katarzyna Czechowicz (PAP)

kap/ agt/