1. For a year Russia has been trying to influence the whole world and wherever it can, promotes the narrative that “Ukraine is a terrorist country” (this is one of the two main Russian narratives for 2024–2025).
2. On the eve of negotiations in Istanbul, where Russia will present the conditions unacceptable, it is necessary to conduct a countergrain in which everyone will speak not about these demands, but about the inability to negotiate with the “terrorist country”, which destroys civil trains without any military purpose.
3. O Bloody staging only for one viewer: for Trump. Placing trains in the style of partisan war from World War II is an argument not to introduce more stringent sanctions now. Let me remind you: Putin's main tactical goal is to prevent such sanctions from introducing such a summer break in Washington.
4. For some reason, no one has asked a logical question so far: If [to faktycznie] Ukrainians planted a radio -controlled bomb under the support of the bridge, or they – and therefore those who blew up the Crimean Bridge, who carried out unique special operations – They couldn't predict all the consequences of blowing up a passenger train?
5. Now the information war has begun “I believe – I don't believe” [że zawalenie się mostów w Rosji to dzieło Ukraińców]. And the main battlefield is Europe and the USA. And this is a key battle for us. The acceleration or slowdown of sanctions depends on it.
Context: On Saturday, May 31 late in the evening in the Bryan region near the border with Ukraine, a railway bridge collapsed, which fell on the tracks, on which a passenger train went to Moscow. As a result of the disaster, seven people were killed and over 60 were injured. In the morning of June 1, a second railway bridge collapsed in the Kurski region, followed by a freight train. The Russians say that there are Ukrainian services behind both disasters, but they did not provide evidence.
