GSP notes after Dinamo – Rapid »Catalog of” Repeators “from Giulești, with Șumudică and Koljic in front + who was the winner of the” dogs “camp

The Rapid was the team that should have drawn on the national arena to approach the European dream, on the last turning of the championship. However, the band of Șumudică checked a painful evening, saved only by the fantastic interventions of Aioani. The Giuleștean goalkeeper opposed vital moments, on a total forcing of the hosts, who did not find the way to the redeeming void.

Dinamo's notes after the equal with the fast

Roşca (note 6) * unemployed, a single intervention at a completion of Petrila, Dinamo will save water, because the goalkeeper's equipment has been immaculate for the next round

Sivis (note 6) * position fixed very high, generally in the middle of the field, favored by a quick withdrawn in the lip of the gate of Aioani. Lost most of the balls of the defenders (12), but compensated with an offensive aplomb in a series of centering that destabilized Giulesti

Boateng (note 7) * He bit the opponent, a beast in duels, appeared once and at the end, received a warning, escaped possession only in five situations. The man on whom he can be built with a defensive tact for the next season!

Homawoo (note 7) * He often sought launches, gathered most defensive actions (4 outputs, 2 blocked kicks, 4 intercepts, 2 tackling)

Opruț (note 5) * Like Sivis, positioned priority to the center of the land, with a fast descended in trenches, was, however, the most fragile link of Dinamo's defense in times when the guests realized that there is also an opponent's gate.

Milanov (note 7) * Three successive losses, an unlikely defeat by Aioani, ultra-representative on construction and completion, aggressive in duels, the speedsmen responded with the same rough currency

Olsen (note 6) * Generous percentage in terms of successful passes (76 out of 85, 89%), sacrifice pawn in the central area deliberately crowded by “dogs” to control the middle of the land. The favorite executor of the corneters, with lack of efficiency

Cîrjan (note 8) * Just miss the goal! A bar, the title of the median area, a permanent danger to the dizziness of the defense of the fast. Most balls played from all the players on the lawn: 115. A good evening, since it was uncertain before the match

Selmani (note 6) * The most failed player from Dinamo (3) could bring in three points if Aioani had not miraculously blocked the shot of the last few minutes

Perica (note 5) * More pivot to help with spaces for the benefit of the lanes, it never got the gate of three attempts

Al. Pop (note 6) * He lacked the individual actions, preferred either remotely or resulting from fixed phases. Aioani blocked one of the great occasions of the guests

Coach Zeljko Kopic (note 6) * The Croatian could not put the ball in the net! A note in the team's average, made logical decisions in a match that would have been worth one hundred percent wins

They played:

Denis Political (note 5) * A very discreet return, only one centering in half an hour. Otherwise, absent from important moments!

Abdallah (note 4) * 25 minutes with a yellow card for protests, in extensions. Na brought the plus proposed in attack

Caragea and Costin they played too little to be noted.

Notes for Rapid after Dinamo draw

The quickists were on their knees in front of Dinamo, but they miraculously gathered a point. Photo: Ionuț Iordache (GSP)

Aioani (note 8) * He saved his team from a defeat that would have been logical. The match meant, in fact, an Aioani vs Dinamo dispute

Braun (note 5) * It was wrong half of the balloons played (17 out of 35 precise passes, 49%)! And the launches meant a disaster, being, in fact, to no one (1 in 6)!

Ciobotariu (note 6) * The only merit is that you are not committed by positioning or intervention as in previous matches. The safest man in the defensive of Șumudică

Ignat (note 6) * Complementary to Ciobotariu, but with minus on defensive intake: zero blocked kicks, zero interceptions, a single air duel gained from 4 episodes

Borza (note 4) * Selmani, Milanov and Sivis had fun on the left flank of the Rapid, the favorite area of ​​pressure to Aioani's gate

Christensen (note 5) * With the exception of Braun, he lost most of the balls in the Rapid camp (16). Corners executed without effect, as if at random

Hromada (note 5) * Changed at the break and due to exposure to elimination, after collecting a yellow in the first half. Hardness displayed from the impotence of the team!

Ademo (note 3) * A perfect disaster! No existed!

Dobre (note 6) * The only man who tried to move in the attack of Rapid on rare moments of attack. But he managed a dribbling throughout the match and managed to send a single, blocked

Koljic (note 2) * Mourning! With a big j! Note that he has reached the ball only 8 times in 45 minutes and no won no air duel out of 5 opportunities! A completely failed transfer

Petrila (note 5) * The most failed man of Rapid (3), had, paradoxically, more defensive achievements than offensive, with a Giuleștean team crammed into a row in his own

Coach Marius Șumudică (note 3) * Nothing came out, from the starting gasket to the changes and the flame attitude of the team. It seems that the players do not swallow him or that, feeling his imminent departure, nor does he notice him

They played:

Burmaz (note 4) * I didn't bring anything extra in the offensive. Just something more present than the anonymous Koljic

Gojkovic (note 4) * Whoever enters the break could only be a little more useful than ADEMO

Vulturar (note 5) * The most present visit man on the bench, gathered in 45 minutes most interceptions in the Rapid group (3), tried to get the team on the attack and through long balls

R. Pop (note 4) * 20 minutes in which he at least tried to go out with individual actions, but invariably blocked in situations of net numerical

Micovschi (note 4) * In a collapsed team, it didn't have the world to change in 15-16 minutes

Referee: Marcel Bârsan – 7. Assistants – Radu Ghinguleac – 7, Ionuț Neacșu (all Bucharest) – 7.