“For that club he signed someone who is not employed by them” + when the decision is coming from the Court of Appeal

Initially, last year, the FRF approach was rejected by the court, which is why the forum at the Football House addressed the Bucharest Court of Appeal. The Complete CAB, formed by the judges Aneta Popa and Raluca Focșa, remained in pronouncement. The decision at the Court of Appeal is possible to appear on Thursday, April 10th.

In the meantime, however, two of the interveners, AFC Rapid and ACSTC Pamira, have started the procedures for notifying and stating club statements, trying to prove that FRF has committed false and use of false.

As GSP.ro wrote, it is about those tables with signatures presented in court by FRF lawyers as being gathered between April 5-10, 2024, following the general meeting of April 5, which decided to affiliate 278 members.

Only 13 clubs participated in that meeting, which remained of the 80 that appeared as affiliated in 2002. And the FRF opponents claim that, in fact, those signatures in the tables were given by clubs only for the presence at the General Assembly that took place at the Football House two months later, on June 4.

Marius Vecerdea: “At the General Assembly of FRF in June 2024 they voted legally non -affiliated clubs”

Marius Vecerdea, the president of Pamira, presented the court on Wednesday, April 9, the statements of several sports groups in Sibiu, including Hermannstadt, who claim that they did not know about that April 2024 meeting and that they would not have signed any table for the affiliation of new members.

“I submitted to the case file these statements. Then, in April 2024, the FRF organized that general meeting” apartment “, of which there is no evidence, nothing. No one knew about it. The FRF lawyers said in court that, later, between April 5 and 10, 20 cars would have been in the country. From Sibiu I claim that they have not signed anything like this.

In the case of Hermannstadt, he could only sign the judicial administrator, the club being insolvency. But there appears the signature of one of the associates, Daniel Ghețe, who was present only at the June 4 Assembly. Assembly that did not have on the agenda the affiliation of new members.

Then they were representatives from UEFA, from FIFA, who were lied to that FRF has 278 affiliated members. Over one hundred are public law entities, CSS, LPS, ANS clubs, which are run by officials of various ministries or mayors, ie the state. They cannot be part of the federations, according to that appeal in the interest of the law of 2023.

Not to mention that he violates the white charter of sport and all the treaties concluded with the European Union. In addition, those clubs could not vote anything at the June General Assembly, because they are not legally affiliated now, ”said Vecerdea.

“For Interstar Sibiu he signed someone who is not employed by them”

He also added that “besides Hermannstadt, no other clubs, such as the Football and Tennis Academy Măgura Sibiu, women's club in Liga 1, which has a collaboration with my club, and which is in the same situation, that is to say, it signed those tables.

President of Alma is Bogdan Cherecheș, who did not sign anything in April. And on that table, Iulian Merindean, coach at Alma, the sending of the club at the FRF General Assembly in June. In the case of the Children's and Junior Club Interstar Sibiu, things are even more serious.

They didn't even sign anything in April. But on the FRF tables appears the signature of a gentleman, Andrei Popa, who has no function at Intersar. He works at AFCE Alma, as an instructor. And he was mandated to represent the interstary at the same June General Assembly. It is obvious that those signatures, see ladies from the additional act to the FRF constitutive act, from April, were only those of presence at the June General Assembly. “

AJF Sibiu certified that he did not sign the tables from April

Horia Manoliu, the representative of AFC Rapid, a party in the trial, also submitted to the court that the ones from AJF Sibiu did not sign those tables from April 2024. It is specified that, according to the extracts from the Ministry of Justice, AJF Sibiu is the only legal association constituted legally, having as members of this legal person, and not the rest of this legal person.

Further, it is specified that “Mr. Ioan Duma as president of AJF Sibiu, did not sign an additional act to the constitutive act of the FRF neither on April 5, 2024, nor on April 5-10, nor to another time.

He is not aware of Age FRF on April 5, 2024. He responded to the FRF convening at AGO on June 4, 2024 and even participated as a guest, and not for the FRF AG, and signed the presence list at AGO FRF on June 4 from the quality of guest … “.

The latest information from sources close to the trial claims that tomorrow the decision of the Court of Appeal could be announced in this case. And that if the FRF will not receive the opinion now for the amendments of constitutive documents of 2024, the opponents would request the appointment of a curator or judicial administrator. To make the necessary decisions to enter the FRF in legality.