Who benefits more from the increased presence – Nicușor Dan or George Simion? What shows us the great presence related to the counties where the two had the best scores
In the first round, George Simion attributed to most of the countries of the country, winning over 2,700 localities. Nicușor Dan, on the other hand, has won a lot in the big cities, and now, in round 2, the votes in Urban are more than 27%, while the rural increased as a 20%presence.
In round 2, at 5 pm, The country's presence was 24.17% higher compared to the one recorded at the same time in the first round.
Analyzing the best ten results (percent) in counties obtained by Nicușor Dan and George Simion in the first round, we observe the following:
– Only three counties in the top of Simion register an increase in presence above the country average (four of them have below 20%)
– while for Nicușor Dan eight of the ten counties, they have a greater increase in the presence than average in the country (four of them have over 30% growth).
Presence now in the counties where Nicușor Dan had the best scores
Top counties where Nicușor Dan registered his highest scores and presence in round 2 at 5 pm:
- 1. Bucharest – Nicușor Dan took 40.59%, at a total presence of 50.63%
In round 2, at 5 pm, the presence in Bucharest was 30.7% higher than in round I.
- 2. Cluj – 35.49% (presence 55.97%)
In round 2, at 5 pm, the presence in Cluj was 35.4% higher than in round I.
- 3. Brașov – 33.39% (presence 51.84%)
In round 2, at 5 pm, the presence in Brasov was 27% higher than in round I.
- 4. Sibiu – 28.72% (presence 47.85%)
In round 2, at 5 pm, the presence in Sibiu was 32% higher than in round I.
- 5. Timiș – 28.68% (presence 49.17%)
In round 2, at 5 pm, the presence in Timiș was 32.9% higher than in round I.
- 6. Iasi – 28.51% (presence 42.37%)
In round 2, at 5 pm, the presence in Iași was 24.9% higher than in round I.
- 7. Ilfov – 27.82% (presence 68.09%)
In round 2, at 5 pm, the presence in Ilfov was 28.2% higher than in round I.
- 8. Constanța – 22.29% (presence 52.02%)
In round 2, at 5 pm, the presence in Constanța was 19.6% higher than in round I.
- 9. Prahova – 20.17% (presence 52.1%)
In round 2, at 5 pm, the presence in Prahova was 25% higher than in round I.
- 10. Maramureș – 18.35% (presence 40.71%)
In round 2, at 5 pm, the presence in Maramureș was 23.6% higher than in round I.
Presence now in the counties where George Simion had the best scores
Top 5 counties where George Simion recorded his highest scores and presence in round 2 at 5 pm:
- 1. Tulcea – George Simion took 51.19%, at a presence of 46.08%
In round 2, at 17.00, the presence in Tulcea was 20% higher than in the 1st round
- 2. Gorj – 49.54% (presence 51.07%)
In round 2, at 5 pm, the presence in Gorj was 12% higher than in the Tour I.
- 3. Suceava – 49.55% (presence 42.9%)
In round 2, at 5 pm, the presence in Suceava was 20% higher than in round I.
- 4. Calarasi – 47.9% (presence 49.94%)
In round 2, at 5 pm, the presence in Calarasi was 19.6% higher than in round I.
- 5. Ialomița – 47.23% (presence 44.99%)
In round 2, at 5 pm, the presence in Ialomița was 24.7% higher than in round I.
- 6. Arad – 46.66% (presence 45.59%)
In round 2, at 5 pm, the presence in Arad was 28.4% higher than in round I.
- 7. Caraș-Severin-46.35% (presence 43.15%)
In round 2, at 5 pm, the presence in Crașa-Severin was 12.6% higher than in round I.
- 8. Dâmbovița – 46.03% (presence 50.26%)
In round 2, at 5 pm, the presence in Dâmbovița was 22.5% higher than in round I.
- 9. Botosani – 45.68% (presence 42.9%)
In round 2, at 5 pm, the presence in Botosani was 21.4% higher than in round I.
- 10. Neamț – 45.41% (presence 42.76%)
In round 2, at 5 pm, the presence in Neamț was 19.6% higher than in round I.
