Featured

Cuba under US surveillance. Donald Trump's decision hangs in the air


For months, the Pentagon has been engaged in deploying the troops and weapons necessary for the United States to launch an armed attack on Cuba – all that is missing is final approval from Donald Trump.

The president began to consider invading the island after economic and political pressure failed to overthrow the communist government. With a strengthened naval presence in the region—the largest in the world outside the Middle East—the United States could take immediate action.

There are several options on the table

Strategically deployed forces set the stage for possible military action, ranging from the capture of Havana's leaders, similar to the detention of former Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, to a series of precision strikes. They also open up the possibility that the United States will become involved in the Trump administration's third international conflict.

Cuba is in serious trouble Secretary of State Marco Rubio said during a full-cabin meeting on Wednesday. “The existence of a failed state within 90 miles of our coast is a threat to the national security of the United States,” he said.

The article continues below the video
The fleet in the region is now slightly smaller than it was in January, when the United States captured Maduro. But in May, the USS Nimitz aircraft carrier strike group sailed to the Caribbean, along with several guided-missile destroyers and cruisers that can fire precision missiles at land targets. According to flight tracking websites, advanced American drones and reconnaissance planes have also been flying over Cuba for months. USS Kearsarge landing ships with escort, with 2.5 thousand people on board. Marines, are off the coast of Virginia, preparing for a new assignment and may replace some units returning home.

Strengthening the forces opens up a number of military options, although the Pentagon would need additional troops to conduct a large-scale land invasion.

The Nimitz arrived in the region the same day the United States impeached former President Raul Castro — in what appeared to be a public show of force. “The Nimitz is probably there primarily for intimidation purposes, although it could be used in a military operation if necessary” – said Mark Cancian, a former Pentagon official and currently a senior analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

In his opinion, this ship, along with combat aircraft stationed in Florida and Puerto Rico, would probably play an important role in a possible military operation in Cuba. — Airstrikes are possible to destroy their air defenses to enable broader air operations or, perhaps, to eliminate their leadership with a view to establishing a relationship similar to that we have with Venezuela. The first target would be Raul Castro, he said.

This may slow down Washington's ambitions

However, the administration has limited time to take action. Many of the largest warships deployed during the summer are approaching 10 months at sea, well beyond the standard six to seven months. This raises concerns among Department of Defense officials about the excessive workload on crews and increases pressure on naval forces, which are also blocking Iranian ships in the Persian Gulf.

The White House referred questions to the Pentagon. The Navy declined to comment on current deployments. Southern Naval Command did not respond to a request for comment.

“These long, consecutive missions will add up over time,” said a Defense Department official who asked not to be named to speak candidly about military operations. “Keeping them there for so long creates more problems in the long run in terms of refurbishing and repairing these ships once they return home,” he pointed out.

The extended missions follow a record 11-month deployment of the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford, which ended this month after sailing from Europe to the Caribbean for operations against Maduro and then to the Middle East for the conflict with Iran.

“Nimitz” also extended its mission, which was to be the last in its 50-year career. It was initially scheduled to sail to Norfolk, Virginia, to have its nuclear engines removed, but the Navy decided to extend its service life until 2027.

The amphibious assault ships USS Iwo Jima and USS Fort Lauderdale have also remained in place since the summer, although the Marine Corps announced Wednesday that they will return to Norfolk next week.

However, the long missions take a toll on crews and Marines who had planned to rotate normally and are now months away from their originally scheduled return home.

“You don't join the military to have an easy life – you know there's uncertainty in every mission,” said Joe Plenzler, a retired Marine Corps officer. — But such extension of the mission, when it seems like it has no end, begins to have a negative impact on staff retention. What are the chances that I will be able to convince my family to re-enter and persevere in the ministry? – he asks rhetorically.

Ashley Davis

I’m Ashley Davis as an editor, I’m committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity and accuracy in every piece we publish. My work is driven by curiosity, a passion for truth, and a belief that journalism plays a crucial role in shaping public discourse. I strive to tell stories that not only inform but also inspire action and conversation.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button